Author Topic: Review, Mods and use of my cheap ($325 shipped) Laser  (Read 6176 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chris333

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 18096
  • Respect: +5515
Re: Review, Mods and use of my cheap ($325 shipped) Laser
« Reply #30 on: October 04, 2016, 01:11:19 AM »
+1
These window muntins were drawn .012" thick.


I lost one in the window right above the steps.

These parts were cut by Monroe Models.

Ian MacMillan

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12025
  • Gender: Male
  • Learn to use the god damn search feature!
  • Respect: +157
    • Conrail's Amoskeag Northern Division
Re: Review, Mods and use of my cheap ($325 shipped) Laser
« Reply #31 on: January 31, 2017, 09:31:33 PM »
0
Rodney, so 5mos later what do you think of it? I've been able to find the same model on ebay now around ~$250 shipped and have been thinking of picking one up.

I've seen a few people on the web say after a few months since they wouldn't get one but I figured I'd ask someone in the same hobby what they thought.

I understand you get what you pay for, but the Versalaser  at $3000 is just not in the cards right now.
I WANNA SEE THE BOAT MOVIE!

Yes... I'm in N... Also HO and 1:1

rodsup9000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 991
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +644
Re: Review, Mods and use of my cheap ($325 shipped) Laser
« Reply #32 on: February 06, 2017, 11:43:52 AM »
+1
 I would still buy it. There is so much you can do with it in N scale that I really think it is worth it to have it.
Rodney

My Feather River Canyon in N-scale
http://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=31585.0

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 31839
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +4613
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Review, Mods and use of my cheap ($325 shipped) Laser
« Reply #33 on: February 06, 2017, 04:28:56 PM »
0
I would still buy it. There is so much you can do with it in N scale that I really think it is worth it to have it.

But Ian abandoned N and is now into H0!  :trollface:
. . . 42 . . .