Author Topic: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand  (Read 3282 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9384
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6187
    • www.bbussey.net
Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« on: June 28, 2016, 10:01:53 AM »
0
These are just so impressive.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net
Bridgeport & New London in N scale


SP-Wolf

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 834
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2085
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2016, 10:47:29 AM »
0
These do look awesome. I will be picking up a few. Are the 351's coming out soon-?
And -- are these paint schemes appropriate for the mid '50's. (Or - as delivered)

Thanks,
Wolf

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3829
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1375
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2016, 11:25:57 AM »
0
Train worx has been making some amazing stuff lately. The GS gondola really pushes the boundaries for N scale freight cars and gives HO a run for its money detail wise! These trucks keep up that tradition...

Wish Pat all the best and hope he can keep making awesome stuff for years to come!

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9384
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6187
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2016, 12:14:15 PM »
0
If the 280s are out, the 351s must be as well.  Yes, these are appropriate for mid 1950s.
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net
Bridgeport & New London in N scale


Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26075
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11551
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2016, 12:28:12 PM »
0
Damn. Seriously. Trainworx just seriously keeps creating amazing stuff. I've held off because they aren't high priority things for me, but it's been VERY tough.

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8945
  • Respect: +1381
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2016, 03:07:55 PM »
0
I got mine a couple days ago too but didn't take a pic sans layout or diorama.  But since we're sharing... :)





The yellow one had the air filter busted off.  I'd be curious if anyone else gets one like that.

Jason

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2016, 04:07:04 PM »
0
I'm truck dumb. Educate me.

Are these (both models) 50s era tractors then?
Buffering...

unittrain

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1492
  • Respect: +148
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2016, 04:31:11 PM »
0
I'm truck dumb. Educate me.

Are these (both models) 50s era tractors then?
Yep built 1949 to 1957 8)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterbilt

bnsfdash8

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 678
  • Respect: +1653
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2016, 06:19:17 PM »
+1
I picked up one of the 351's just to rebuild into a grain truck. I also picked up some spare parts for TW to build a grain pup trailer.

Reese
Modeling Norfolk Southern one loco at a time.

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3922
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1056
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2016, 07:25:59 PM »
0
Yep built 1949 to 1957 8)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterbilt

WTF? Never would have guessed that. They look like they could fit right in a modern traffic jam.
Peter Pfotenhauer

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35273
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6641
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2016, 07:30:44 PM »
0
WTF? Never would have guessed that. They look like they could fit right in a modern traffic jam.

That's because many modern trucks retained their old look. Things like headlights have changed (and mechanically they are a bit different), but the overall shape has not changed much.
. . . 42 . . .

MichaelWinicki

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2096
  • Respect: +335
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2016, 08:42:35 PM »
0
Luv to see one of those single axle tractors as an AMT 1/25 model.

Cajonpassfan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5398
  • Respect: +1973
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2016, 11:08:51 PM »
0
Yep built 1949 to 1957 8)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterbilt

That source says 1954 and later, not 1949. So what am I missing (other than a 1950 appropriate model)?
Otto K.

w neal

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1434
  • Respect: +483
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #13 on: June 28, 2016, 11:22:33 PM »
0
So like, these would have still been around in the mid 60s? (Wink Wink, Nudge Nudge)
Buffering...

Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3829
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1375
Re: Trainworx standard-scheme Peterbilt 280s in hand
« Reply #14 on: June 28, 2016, 11:25:20 PM »
0
That source says 1954 and later, not 1949. So what am I missing (other than a 1950 appropriate model)?
Otto K.

from the wiki article.
Quote
280/350: This is the classic "iron-nose" conventional built from 1949 to 1957. It has distinctive cycle-type front fenders, and a long grille with vertical shutters.

You are good for 1950.
The Trainworx models aren't 281 and 351's as far as I know. different grill would be the main difference.

http://www.train-worx.com/15-8pete350.pdf
« Last Edit: June 28, 2016, 11:32:38 PM by Missaberoad »