0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thanks for the feedback. I see where you're coming from but the one thing that makes me shy away from the red scheme, ability to print my own black decals aside, is that so many other roads in the area used a shade of red as primary. PRR and LV being the biggest PA-local 'abusers'. And there are arguments to be made for the grey, personal aesthetics aside. CB&Q used grey successfully, with red on hood units and as primary color on F units. There are also regional examples of use of such a lighter color, NYS&W and LV's 6 axle Alcos being the most memorable to me. Plus, IMO, it gives a bit of a southern flare to a line invading the north and the scheme overall is unique to the region while winking at others. That being said, I plan on exploring both paths further on a larger Century and on both units with some lettering to complete the schemes.
That screws with my timing of schemes but rewriting history is easy enough.
That opens to a whole new list, AD&N, SP&S...Other roads displaying three names without would be ACL and FEC.Jason
Round two...First, pictured are only RS3s because that particular unit will feature heavily in the 1969-1971 roster and, thus, will have survived through all paint scheme iterations featured here. Second, with that in mind, try to think about how these schemes would look on larger, more modern locos like the other mainstay of my fleet, the C424, as well as C420s, RS11s, and the C415 if it ever gets printed in Shapways. Maybe even some six axle belchers.I took previous critiques about more traditional color use and stripe placement in mind and came up with the following (#1), which represents the as-delivered 1950 scheme:The first iteration of the as-delivered scheme, #2, comes about the time tail fins are hitting the streets, 1957, and gets a little bolder and more hot rod:Then we have two options, going red or going grey. Honestly, I'm leaning towards grey because black lettering will work on it and it's easier to make black decals. The grey line first... In 1961, corporate decides the less expensive grey color of the scheme should take precedence and we get #3A, simply a version of #2:And then in 1966, with cost cutting hitting railroads, we get a even more draconian version in #3B, black roof for freight units, and #3C, red roof for passenger service:A solid grey "scheme" could come in the early seventies but I don't think I need to picture it here.As an alternative to the development in grey, we have the red line. In 1961, corporate does away with grey completely for a bold Deramus-inspired look for freight units (passenger units maintain scheme #2) with the #4A:Then, in 1966, the shop forces go completely lazy and come up with #4B for freight and passenger units:I also reworked the as-delivered Chesapeake Piedmont Midland logo to better graphically point towards the eventual adoption of "Midland" only moniker:And now have two versions of a more modern logo, the square #5 and round #6, not sure which I like better:Note, the logos need a consistent red that works with the dark red featured in the paint scheme.Let the critique begin...