Author Topic: The Ship(s) That Ate My Dining Room  (Read 16113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5304
  • Respect: +2619
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #75 on: January 03, 2016, 05:31:41 PM »
0
Interesting, thanks for the detail.  Ships are obviously different from moorings.  Mind you, I don't know any ships in 2+ km of water but I know many moorings in that kind of depth.

Spades

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 956
  • Respect: +215
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #76 on: January 04, 2016, 01:49:18 PM »
0
Since you ask.  To lie flat on the bottom and not to become fouled, buried or otherwise stuck on the bottom.  If you look at an anchor on a larger ship you will see it has moving parts.

Then why do anchors have the . . . anchor shape?  Their shape sure looks like it is meant to dig into, or snag onto something on the bottom

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8945
  • Respect: +1381
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #77 on: January 04, 2016, 02:17:18 PM »
0
Since you ask.  To lie flat on the bottom and not to become fouled, buried or otherwise stuck on the bottom.  If you look at an anchor on a larger ship you will see it has moving parts.

Once again you have me confused.  Anchors are designed to dig into the bottom.

Here's an old stock anchors doing what it would do on the bottom where the flukes would then dig in.



Here's a modern navy stockless anchor.  You can see how the blades make the flukes pivot to dig in.



Nearly all achors are designed to somehow dig into the bottom.

 :?

Jason

Spades

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 956
  • Respect: +215
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #78 on: January 04, 2016, 03:32:10 PM »
0
Maybe my anal cap is on to tight, yes the anchor grabs the bottom you just don't want to bury it.  Here is a Youtube video from our Indian friends at Karco :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5ttfleepa4

Once again you have me confused.  Anchors are designed to dig into the bottom.


 :?

Jason
« Last Edit: January 05, 2016, 11:51:12 AM by GaryHinshaw »

Spades

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 956
  • Respect: +215
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #79 on: January 04, 2016, 03:37:57 PM »
0
I apologize for creating this national nightmare on anchor theory and design, and causing you confusion and any other mental suffering. Hopefully no damage or lingering after effects.

Respectfully

Greg
« Last Edit: January 05, 2016, 11:50:02 AM by GaryHinshaw »

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13997
  • Respect: +4178
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #80 on: January 04, 2016, 03:41:50 PM »
0
In the case of the Navy anchor -- it's getting painted gold because the ship has superior re-enlistment / retention statistics for the year :)

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35260
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6640
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #81 on: January 04, 2016, 06:05:05 PM »
0
Do the gold painted anchors work better than standard black ones?  :trollface:  ;)
. . . 42 . . .

pnolan48

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1754
  • Respect: +136
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #82 on: January 04, 2016, 06:46:36 PM »
0
I would guess that the gold paint doesn't add significant weight: now, a gold anchor would be an entirely different matter. :)

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13997
  • Respect: +4178
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #83 on: January 04, 2016, 08:41:28 PM »
0
Do the gold painted anchors work better than standard black ones?  :trollface:  ;)

No .. but the bling makes the ship look goooooood !! :)

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9956
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2871
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #84 on: January 04, 2016, 09:27:16 PM »
0
In the case of the Navy anchor -- it's getting painted gold because the ship has superior re-enlistment / retention statistics for the year :)

Cool , I didn't know that . I knew the "E" and hash marks stood for excellence in war games , by winning the best in its class . But to the hash marks I have a question ? Is it only for consecutive year wins , or do the wins carry if there was a gap in years ?


Richie Dost

jnevis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 760
  • Gender: Male
  • WP Lives
  • Respect: +18
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #85 on: January 05, 2016, 05:58:25 AM »
0
Cool , I didn't know that . I knew the "E" and hash marks stood for excellence in war games , by winning the best in its class . But to the hash marks I have a question ? Is it only for consecutive year wins , or do the wins carry if there was a gap in years ?

Battle "E"'s won since commissioning.  S's for safety awards, wrench's (for aviation squadrons) for maintenance awards
Can't model worth a darn, but can research like an SOB.

pnolan48

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1754
  • Respect: +136
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #86 on: January 09, 2016, 03:57:10 PM »
0
Latest progress: the topside tank structure for the 5 LNG compartments. The sections are spaced 100 mm apart. There is an N scale boxcar perched on the structure for scale.

Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5304
  • Respect: +2619
Re: The Ship That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #87 on: January 09, 2016, 04:01:44 PM »
0
You need to change the title to reflect the plural state of affairs!  Love those ships.

pnolan48

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1754
  • Respect: +136
Re: The Ship(s) That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #88 on: January 09, 2016, 07:08:33 PM »
0
Let's see if this changes the title. Nope, just the reply.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35260
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6640
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: The Ship(s) That Ate My Dining Room
« Reply #89 on: January 09, 2016, 07:49:49 PM »
0
Let's see if this changes the title. Nope, just the reply.

If you edit your initial post that will change the title.
. . . 42 . . .