0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
In your opinion. It's not a matter of who is or isn't seeing "my" point of view. I stated the reasons from the manufacturer's viewpoint as to why you won't see another S4 in the near future. Pud also stated the reasons from the same viewpoint. Paul basically gave a non-answer quip regarding the possibility. My personal viewpoint is that it's not an issue as to whether or not another S4 appears. I couldn't care any less. If I wanted one, I would buy the Bachmann version and upgrade any details I felt needed correction. If I wanted sound, I would put a sound-equipped decoder in. If the wheel treads were too fat, I would change the wheels. That's what I would do, rather than pining for a model that may never come. Scott Lupia wrote an NSR article not too long ago that featured a modified Bachmann S4 and it looked outstanding. I can see the motivation behind wanting an Atlas S4 from the viewpoint of a modeler who just wants to take it out of the box and put it on the track. I see it just fine. What is disappointing is that many of the modelers who hold that POV can't understand or refuse to understand why it isn't feasible from the manufacturers POV.
A manufacturer's POV. And if it holds true, I would presume Rapido shouldn't release its HO F40 in N since Kato's unit already exists on the market and the LL unit can always be massaged into one?
Been doing a lot of surfing in Railpictures.net....but most PRR, UP, ATSF, and many others had the square corners...
The problem here is that you are insisting that the manufacturer's point of view is wrong. It isn't.