Author Topic: Springfield!  (Read 10354 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8763
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4229
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: Springfield!
« Reply #90 on: February 01, 2015, 12:06:05 PM »
0
The less foob, the better!  8)
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net


Chris1274

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 140
  • Respect: +6
Re: Springfield!
« Reply #91 on: February 01, 2015, 12:41:41 PM »
0
The less foob, the better!  8)
Someone help me out here- what does "foob" mean? (I googled it and still haven't found an answer :?)

Ike the BN Freak

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1514
  • Respect: +81
Re: Springfield!
« Reply #92 on: February 01, 2015, 01:15:23 PM »
0
Someone help me out here- what does "foob" mean? (I googled it and still haven't found an answer :?)

Foobie, its a fake. Typically in model RR speak, its a car that the proto didn't have, but a manufacturer has painted up for.

Chris1274

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 140
  • Respect: +6
Re: Springfield!
« Reply #93 on: February 01, 2015, 01:19:37 PM »
0
Gotcha, thanks.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 31834
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +4611
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Springfield!
« Reply #94 on: February 01, 2015, 01:39:07 PM »
0
Ah, a "foobie".  That word was was censored on the Atlas forum in its day.  I guess "foob" is just a shortened version.

Foobie is well defined on the Internet ( http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Foobie ) and I the first definition of foob I found in a Google search is interesting (but unrelated to model RR) http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=foob . :D

For that matter neither definition is directly related to model RR, but after all who usually plays with toy trains?  Dirty old men! So it all eventually goes back to bumpy female body parts.  ;)
. . . 42 . . .

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10929
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +8550
Re: Springfield!
« Reply #95 on: February 01, 2015, 01:41:33 PM »
0

eric220

  • The Pitt
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3702
  • Gender: Male
  • Continuing my abomination unto history
  • Respect: +607
    • The Modern PRR
Re: Springfield!
« Reply #96 on: February 01, 2015, 01:49:50 PM »
0
Someone help me out here- what does "foob" mean? (I googled it and still haven't found an answer :?)

As mentioned, short for "foobie":

Found
Only
On
Blatantly
Inaccurate
Equipment
-Eric

Modeling a transcontinental PRR
http://www.pennsylvania-railroad.com

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9657
  • Respect: +1329
Re: Springfield!
« Reply #97 on: February 01, 2015, 02:42:53 PM »
0
Eric: "Blatantly Inaccurate" is the way I think of it.  If the "wrong" model is close, and especially if it's sold as such, it's a "stand-in".  For many prototypes the perfect model may never be made, so a not-quite-right version is acceptable to most purchasers.  But if the car is visibly incorrect, to the average purchaser, it's a foobie.  Naturally, the dividing line depends on the individual buyer, but some models are so far off there's no doubt.
N Kalanaga
Be well

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24094
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +8034
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Springfield!
« Reply #98 on: February 01, 2015, 02:45:02 PM »
0
Sorry - you've asked.  :oops:

I don't think he did. Pete, why do you keep trying to stir up trouble? Don't you understand cause and effect?