Author Topic: CSX Hanover Subdivision  (Read 158819 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5861
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4843
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #420 on: February 01, 2017, 06:12:42 PM »
0
You are making much faster progress than I do! Those grade crossing signals look good, are those available on Shapeways?

Yes, they are.  @Ngineer is the designer

https://www.shapeways.com/shops/Ngineer?section=N+Scale+Railroad+Crossings&s=0

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5861
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4843
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #421 on: February 01, 2017, 06:14:51 PM »
0
A member over at NSN took a shot at redesigning the paper mill area.  I think it's a good start.

GLATFELTER by Adam Henry, on Flickr

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26047
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11502
    • Conrail 1285
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #422 on: February 01, 2017, 09:13:56 PM »
0
The bit of space to the right there begs for the bridge that's there too.

http://www.railpictures.net/photo/125080/

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5861
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4843
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #423 on: February 01, 2017, 09:22:15 PM »
0
As drawn, it really should be on the left, say between 1' and 2' marks somewheres, as York would continue to the right

bdennis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 557
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +172
    • Delaware & Hudson Champlain Division
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #424 on: February 01, 2017, 10:38:32 PM »
0
Looking good.
Im about to build a town for a paper mill so am following along with interest.
Can you please advise what parts of the process the letters on the diagram represent? Are they the same as the Glatfelter Paper Co drawing a page or 2 back?
Brendan Dennis
N scale - Delaware & Hudson Champlain Division

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5861
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4843
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #425 on: February 02, 2017, 04:45:48 PM »
0
Looking good.
Im about to build a town for a paper mill so am following along with interest.
Can you please advise what parts of the process the letters on the diagram represent? Are they the same as the Glatfelter Paper Co drawing a page or 2 back?

I haven't gone back and checked everything, but I am pretty sure that's what he used for the letters.

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3922
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1056
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #426 on: February 03, 2017, 10:34:46 AM »
0
Looking good.
Im about to build a town for a paper mill so am following along with interest.
Can you please advise what parts of the process the letters on the diagram represent? Are they the same as the Glatfelter Paper Co drawing a page or 2 back?

Not to horn in on a thread not my own, but here's a plan for a 1 x 10 space and a photo from one end showing how it looks on the benchwork.
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
Peter Pfotenhauer

bdennis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 557
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +172
    • Delaware & Hudson Champlain Division
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #427 on: February 03, 2017, 10:30:54 PM »
0
Thanks for the added pics Peter..
All good info for my paper mill..
The space I have is similar to your but longer including the 1 turn helix on the left..
Brendan Dennis
N scale - Delaware & Hudson Champlain Division

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5861
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4843
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #428 on: February 05, 2017, 12:02:43 PM »
0
Not to horn in on a thread not my own, but here's a plan for a 1 x 10 space and a photo from one end showing how it looks on the benchwork.
(Attachment Link)

(Attachment Link)

@basementcalling
So it's only a foot deep at the 3 storage tracks, or out to the main ?
« Last Edit: February 05, 2017, 12:07:22 PM by mu26aeh »

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5861
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4843
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #429 on: February 05, 2017, 04:13:46 PM »
0
I pulled everything up in the paper mill area to start with a clean slate.

20170205_142149 by Adam Henry, on Flickr

I left the original coal track in bc of the pit being glued in place.  I will remove it once I figure out new design.

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3922
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1056
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #430 on: February 05, 2017, 05:14:34 PM »
0
@basementcalling
So it's only a foot deep at the 3 storage tracks, or out to the main ?

Reality is 13 inches from backdrop to layout edge on the right half of the plan. That preserves a 36 inch wide aisle.

The blob on the left holds a 18 to 21 inch radius turn back loop with 1 hidden loop for elevation underneath. It's 29 inches in reality from backdrop to layout edge where the left warehouse and storage tracks are. The diagonal area with the power plant building is an addition, but I've been thinking it needs to become an off stage scene areas the building may block areansccess to switching locations. The scene is 58 inches off the floor.
Peter Pfotenhauer

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5861
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4843
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #431 on: February 05, 2017, 07:06:15 PM »
0
I came up with this tonight using the earlier drawing, the overhead PHG shot and google maps.  It can't be done given my current space, but I can widen this section by 10", making it 27 " wide.   :D  Trains would come in on the Frederick Branch of the old PRR instead of using the current YorkRail/old WM line but it will work for the situation.  I'm not too concerned about the inner loop radius, not running power thru there, maybe just shove the coal drag into there while unloading.  And would gap/insulate it as to prevent creating a reverse loop.

2017-02-05_06-52-00 by Adam Henry, on Flickr
« Last Edit: February 05, 2017, 07:09:11 PM by mu26aeh »

basementcalling

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3922
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1056
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #432 on: February 05, 2017, 10:59:01 PM »
+1
Be careful reach in distance doesn't become an issue.

Were I you I would plan on two sides access but use the coal and woodchip piles plus the digester buildings as a backdrop to keep operators seeing omly what's on their side so the scene seems larger.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2017, 12:37:18 PM by basementcalling »
Peter Pfotenhauer

mu26aeh

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5861
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4843
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #433 on: February 05, 2017, 11:16:56 PM »
0
My layout height is only 42" or thereabouts, so I have a little more leeway with the reach police.  But your idea of access on both sides is something else I will have to look into . 

Blazeman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1306
  • Respect: +65
Re: CSX Hanover Subdivision
« Reply #434 on: February 06, 2017, 09:58:25 AM »
+2
Adam: I admire how you have no hesitation to uproot what you have to make things fit your scheme or remedy flaws. Not only that, you have things back in operation  in just a few days.