0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
As others have mentioned, Kato Mikado without a traction tire driver is pretty much useless (which is too bad for such a smooth running and well designed loco). For few years traction tire drivers from the last run were worth their price in gold! After years of modelers pleading with Kato USA (and after years of Kato USA pleading with Kato Japan), around last December another batch of those drivers was produced. But they are all gone again so either Kato again misjudged the demand or speculators bought them all out. That is really too bad. There was a mention of Kato producing yet another batch but I'm not so sure about that. Funny thing is that another small batch of (never to be seen) Mikados (Kobo version) showed up again at MBK. But going back to traction tire drivers, I was lucky enough to buy 8 of them from the latest run at a discount from MBK.As far as the drivers go, I measured (using digital caliper) couple of my Mikados and my results were quite different from Max's. All the drivers have consistent diameter. Here are the measurements: Driver 1 2 3 4 no tire 4 w/tireDia. of the driver's metal tire ------- 0.372" 0.373" 0.372" 0.372" 0.374" with tire, 0.363" metal rim, 0.352" grooveDia. of the drivers flange ------------ 0.424" 0.424" 0.424" 0.424" 0.424"Dia. of the drivers insert opening -- 0.340" 0.340" 0.340" 0.340" 0.323"Dia. of the insert. -------------------- 0.335" 0.335" 0.335" 0.335" 0.320"I was also very surprised that Kato produced a whole new metal wheel and spoke insert just for the TT driver. But then again, Kato likes to over engineer things (no that there is anything wrong with that). I'm pretty sure that they did that because otherwise the thickness of the wheel at the groove area would have been very thin. The groove is 0.0055" deep. that makes the metal in the groove area 0.0145" thick.If they made the TT driver using the standard driver then the thickness of the metal in the groove area 0.006" That would be pretty darn thin! Too thin. I expect that the would have problems reliably turning their wheels without the outside of the metal tire tire breaking off.Lemosteam: I would look at this from a different perspective. I suspect that if the traction tire driver wasn't an afterthought, Kato would have made all the drivers with the same dimensions as the TT driver (to simplify production). But of course only the TT driver would have a groove in it.Here are some photos of the difference between standard and traction tire driver. The difference is quite obvious. In case it isn't, the TT driver is on the left.In this photo I splices quarter of the standard driver on top of the TT driver. I aligned it by the edge of the metal tire (the difference of the flange depth on the right side is caused parallax error of the camera (it wasn't perfectly centered and perpendicular over the driver).
But wait Max, what if you pressed Bachmann drivers onto ALL the axles so they match... (Ughh. Trix driver conversion all over again....)
But the Bachmann drivers (with the blind spokes) are so crude and ugly! Why ruin a perfectly presentable Kato locomotive with drivers which look like they came from an old child's toy?! Just to get a traction tire? I would rather spend the money on the real thing.
FYI...http://www.ebay.com/itm/KATO-11-604-Pair-of-N-scale-Mikado-4-driver-with-traction-tire-NEW-/350569793821?pt=Model_RR_Trains&hash=item519f96891dThey are out there on a regular basis...