Author Topic: Bachmann 4-6-0  (Read 13244 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9956
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2868
Bachmann 4-6-0
« on: December 17, 2010, 12:57:27 AM »
0
Shown in a finished shape in this video
/>
« Last Edit: December 17, 2010, 02:36:55 AM by up1950s »


Richie Dost

delamaize

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2642
  • Gender: Male
  • Prairie Line Native
  • Respect: +974
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2010, 03:26:49 AM »
0
ooooooo nice. Count me in for one!
Mike
Skookumchuck Belt Line Founder

Northern Pacific, Tacoma Division, 4th subdivision "The Prarie Line" (still in planning stages)

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5389
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +2151
    • Modutrak
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2010, 09:20:01 AM »
0
Has anyone discovered prototype matches yet?

SkipGear

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2431
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +646
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2010, 09:26:40 AM »
0
If what I am told is correct, this loco could open the flood gates for Bachmann to do more smaller prototypes. I forsee the Russian 2-10-0 next. This loco was designed modularly, replaceable domes and stacks on a metal boiler. There is more but I will wait until the loco's are in hand to confirm the details.

I'm very hopeful for this one. It is a very promising step forward.
Tony Hines

SkipGear

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2431
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +646
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2010, 09:40:39 AM »
0
Some close examples, not exact but close...

A little larger but same general configuration.

B&O - http://www.northeast.railfan.net/images/bo2021s.jpg

B&O Baldwin - http://www.northeast.railfan.net/images/bo232s.jpg

Smaller drivers but missing the modernizing updates..

B&O Baldwin - http://www.northeast.railfan.net/images/bo241s.jpg
Tony Hines

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9956
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2868
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2010, 09:57:39 AM »
0
My targets will be a close enough to UP 1242 and 1243 , both of which were active all the way to 1955 .


« Last Edit: December 17, 2010, 10:04:27 AM by up1950s »


Richie Dost

93cram

  • Guest
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2010, 11:19:43 AM »
0
This is a nice engine  8)
Would it be adaptable to CMStP&O prototypes ?
If I'm correct, it looks like the Omaha road had lots of 'modernized' 4-6-0.

Marc

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11850
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +932
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2010, 11:45:34 AM »
0
The only visual downside is Bachmann's policy on putting less than appropriate tenders on these.

The loco looks really nice.


Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11850
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +932
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2010, 11:48:07 AM »
0
Has anyone discovered prototype matches yet?

This has been out in HO for a while right? (?) If so maybe the HO crowd worked it out.


David Leonard

  • Guest
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #9 on: December 17, 2010, 07:28:31 PM »
0
The NYC had similar 4-6-0's, somewhat "modernized" (e.g. domes and headlight.) http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/nyc/nyc-s1290s.jpg

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12334
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8559
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #10 on: December 17, 2010, 08:26:46 PM »
0
That N scale Bachmann 4-6-0 screams Tweetsie RR (ex-ET&WNC) ten-wheeler to me, but standard gauged.  Interestingly, Bachmann makes that 4-6-0 in G scale.

A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Still General Counsel to the Laurel Valley Ry.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12231
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +11646
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #11 on: December 17, 2010, 09:04:02 PM »
0
Beautiful locomotive, but I'm sorry, the tender is still bothersome to me.  Obviously the wrong tender for that loco.  I wish they would have taken the time to tool an appropriate tender; I'd be willing to pay a little more for that.  As it is, it would take pretty much a major surgical job to be appropriate for the M&PA.  Would guess shortening the frame by about half plus a whole new tender tank and bunker...

SkipGear

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2431
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +646
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #12 on: December 18, 2010, 12:06:23 AM »
0
Dave,
 It's not about a lack of a proper tooled tender, they have one in the short USRA. I have found quite a few pictures of 4-6-0's with a similar Short USRA tender with the higher bunker sides. Many did come with a low side or no side bunker though. For Richie's version, he just needs to shorten up a MP vanderbilt and he is good to go.

The excuse given was that they could not fit their decoder in the smaller tender. Bachmann makes their own decoders using Lenz parts on their own equipment. They don't out source, everything in a Bachmann loco is done in house. Their equipment is not up to par to place components with the precision needed to do a micro decoder yet. I think the Tsunami sound decoders in their HO is the same way, not a true Tsunami but one built by Bachmann using Tsunami parts.
Tony Hines

Nato

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2302
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +161
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #13 on: December 18, 2010, 12:51:49 AM »
0
      The HO version of this locomotivedoes not suffer from the tender size problem, they have manufactured them with a nicer smaller tender. Nate Goodman (Nato). "Wondering if the Model Power tender will adapt?"

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9956
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2868
Re: Bachmann 4-6-0
« Reply #14 on: December 18, 2010, 01:15:00 AM »
0
      The HO version of this locomotivedoes not suffer from the tender size problem, they have manufactured them with a nicer smaller tender. Nate Goodman (Nato). "Wondering if the Model Power tender will adapt?"

With enough of nads and tools every tender can be convinced to obey .


Richie Dost