0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
:
smaller pad (not the problem) and at 90 Degrees from the pad surface...
and your point is what? While it may not seem like it, the difference in scale makes a difference...not that any point I make will make any difference either... : Quote from: Skibbe on July 02, 2010, 11:34:53 PM :
Quote from: Shipsure on July 02, 2010, 10:09:16 PMsmaller pad (not the problem) and at 90 Degrees from the pad surface...So, what's to prevent one from setting up the fixture to angle the shell such that the blister is closer to 90 degrees to the pad? (Being a complete ignoramus about these things, I'm probably talking out my butt here, right?)
Quote from: Shipsure on July 03, 2010, 12:28:52 AMand your point is what? While it may not seem like it, the difference in scale makes a difference...not that any point I make will make any difference either... : Quote from: Skibbe on July 02, 2010, 11:34:53 PM :Joe-I'm just frustrated that MTL doesn't seem to have respect for the hobby. If MTL can't do it, fine, they can't do it. But please stop there. Don't then decide to change things around to make it work out easier in production. It's like the wide body engines. If an SD40-2 and a GP-35 can't be done to scale, cost effectively or otherwise, by the staff at MTL, fine, don't do them. Why weren't the E8's first in line? Or an FP45/F45 instead of the SD40-2? Or a BL-2 instead of a GP-9? There's plenty of projects out there that MTL could handle just fine. Work within the capacity.