0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
...tankcar...MTL specifically makes a low-mount coupler (#2004) with an offset shank to handle this.
Bryan, I probably don't want to dive into this but Zox is correct, when the train is being pulled. It is most evident when a short coupled car is coupled to a car with a lot of overhang. Body mounts produce more sideforce on the truck on tighter radius. On large radius, and more important, when backing a train, bodymount's are better for sure, but pulling, talgo trucks are more efficient.The best example, isn't even between cars but between a steam loco and tender. Mounting the drawbar at the rear of a super power steam loco puts excess leverage and side load on the drivers, often causing the nose of the loco to be derailed. The worst loco to exhibit this is the Walthers/LL Berkshire. Chris has an excellent fix for the problem and that is relocating the drawbar as close to the rear axle as possible. It increased the pulling power and reliability of the loco.Bodymounts don't decrease the side load, but do decrease torsional load on the truck and this is seen most when backing.
The general statement Zox made that truck-mounts are better is misleading and not accurate.
i have a fictional prototype ???
Quote from: John on February 24, 2010, 09:33:33 PMi have a fictional prototype ???Oh, that one's not coming from anyone on the Railwire. I just got a little too close to a Tony Koester book recently, that was giving off a "Death To Freelancers" aura.