0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'm going to guess I'm all by myself on this one, but the Biggest POS, without a doubt I have obtained in the first 10 years of the 2000's in the Bachmann 2-8-0 Consolidation.... both the original one that flat out didn't run and the replacement that ran for a day then sputtered and died.... garbage; total and complete trash....yet there will be some that would nominate it for a product of the decade award..... all of which means that Bachmann's QC on that project may have been the POS more so than the Connie.
The bad running 2-8-0 thing still confuses me. I have 6 of them now and all run smooth as silk, including the one I picked up on E-bay that "Does Not Run" for $18. The last one that we sold at our shop that had any kind of issues was 3 years ago and it's only problem was under gauge pilot truck that wouldn't make it through turnouts. There have been many since with no issues.
I think alot of the QC issues are in the past, at least for the 2-8-0. Some of the very first ones we sold definitely had issues; side rods loose, under gauge, tight mechanisms, etc. In the last 3 years or so, I have seen nothing to get uptight about. I am very confident selling a 2-8-0 at the shop without testing it now, not so much a few years back. Unfortunately, first impressions seem to be the only ones most remember. The Walthers 0-8-0 has seemed to suffer the same fate. The first batch had issues, yet the loco's from the second batch have been flawless in my experience.
Quote from: SkipGear on December 24, 2009, 08:37:17 PMThe bad running 2-8-0 thing still confuses me. I have 6 of them now and all run smooth as silk, including the one I picked up on E-bay that "Does Not Run" for $18. The last one that we sold at our shop that had any kind of issues was 3 years ago and it's only problem was under gauge pilot truck that wouldn't make it through turnouts. There have been many since with no issues.Ergo my initial comment thta Bachmann's QC department is in the running for the POS award rather than the model itself......
A rare mis-step for Atlas. I wonder if these (C40-8W's) will be banished to hell along with the IM SD45-2's?Speaking of which, I had the trusty old Unitrack oval out the other day testing some recent acquisitions and put a CN SD45T-2 on for a spin... yikes! The TM actually slowed down going through the curves. Wow The ACR SD40's on the other hand ran flawlessly. Amazing the difference, but not surprising. Yeah, someone is buying the Algoma Central SD40's.
Quote from: Ryan87 on December 23, 2009, 08:58:43 PMQuote from: lock4244 on December 23, 2009, 09:29:21 AMYeah, someone is buying the Algoma Central SD40's.So you're the other one... ;DYup... buying cores for eventual conversion to CN SD40's.
Quote from: lock4244 on December 23, 2009, 09:29:21 AMYeah, someone is buying the Algoma Central SD40's.So you're the other one... ;D
Yeah, someone is buying the Algoma Central SD40's.
Quote from: lock4244 on December 24, 2009, 12:41:10 AMYup... buying cores for eventual conversion to CN SD40's.CP rented a bunch of ACR SD40/SD40-2 units in the late 1980s. You could use them as lease power.
Yup... buying cores for eventual conversion to CN SD40's.
Quote from: cv_acr on December 27, 2009, 10:27:12 PMCP rented a bunch of ACR SD40/SD40-2 units in the late 1980s. You could use them as lease power.I remember chasing one east out of Agincourt to Oshawa one night. Kato made more than enough for one AC to wind up as a leaser... though I personally never saw an AC SD40 in CP service, just their SD40-2's.
CP rented a bunch of ACR SD40/SD40-2 units in the late 1980s. You could use them as lease power.