0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Actually Ed, I'm not convinced that they will go ahead with the entire line on the 40-2's. Just have a funny feeling. And they have run the heck outta the F units. Maybe it's time for a break and something new.
They need to get "schooled" on how to 100% finish a product, not just do their usual 85% completion, with the modeler to finish up/correct it.
Meh. If I had the space, I'd go HO. <flame suit on>
I wonder how many customers they lost when they told Jerry Britton over on the Atlas board that the PRR was a "fifth tier RR". Whether it was fifth tier or not is not the issue it is just something you do not say to potential customers, especially SPF's.
would like to see the full quote please instead of the excerpt, so we can read it in the proper context. But it seems to me they would be referring to how products decorated for the PRR sells for InterMountain, NOT what the status of the actual Pennsylvania Railroad was during its existence. Given that the Pennsy has been gone for 40 years, it's quite conceivable that the popularity of PRR products is not as strong as it was 20 years ago.I will say that Pennsy does well for me - but I am not moving the kind of numbers that InterMountain is either.
Well, I didn't have a reservation in, only because I couldn't find the RDG F7 advertised. I'd like a pair, but if they cancel, they cancel. it gives me an excuse to pick up a cheap F7 and paint it. I highly doubt 2 units from me would make or break the deal. I was interested in their FPs too, which I had heard about, but gave up on that one as well...being announced a year ago or so, and nothing materializing.
Let me clear one thing up . . .The QUESTION I was asked that led to the "not first tier" comment was "What are the best selling roadnames and paint schemes" I answered it for IRC, as did (I believe) Paul for Atlas. Our experience, based on sales, is that GN, the two Canadian railroads (CP, CN) and then UP. SP, and ATSF are InterMountain's best selling road names. Funny, but Maine Central ends up in there right after ATSF . . . .I didn't say --- although some people think II meanty ---- that PRR wasn't a ""good" railroad to model, OR that IRC would or would not ever make PRR products -- we have and we continue to do so. One look at our product line will confirm WHY our top-selling roadnames are what they are -- the IRC product line is heavily balanced towards Western railroads -- we have a 12 panel boxcar (GN primarily), a Canadian grain hopper (our all-time best selling freight car), several PFE reefers (there's SP and UP) and an ATSF reefer (for the ATSF). The FT, was, less face it, far more common on Western roads than eastern ones -- accounting for the sales figures there -- and PRR didn't see fit to buy FTs, although I bet they'd sell in PRR red five stripes . . . . although that might send Jerry into some sort of fatal fit. . . .In short, I have nothing against the PRR. To this transplanted New England, who had never been west of the Appalachians until I was 30 -- I've long felt the PRR was a fascinating Western railroad -- roaming through the wild , uncharted territories of the Keystone state -- WEST -- of the Hudson River. (And as all real New Englanders know, God put the Hudson there to keep the New Yorkers and the Jerseyites away!!!!!Marty
First of all, re: the "tier" thing . . . . some people don't know when they're having their legs yanked off, let along pulled