Author Topic: Kato Gevo  (Read 20292 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ljudice

  • Guest
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #75 on: October 27, 2009, 07:23:44 PM »
0
No, but....

Got some good stories about Amsterdam, but not over the web, and definitely over alcohol...


Matt G

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Respect: 0
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #76 on: October 27, 2009, 07:28:44 PM »
0
And Matt -

Don't get mad at me - I have 42 of your freight cars and about 20 on order and I love them - and have gotten one dealer to carry them...

I'm a loyal fan of your stuff - and Kato's!!!

:)


Nobody is mad Lou -No worries! It's all good. That other forum is pretty funny though. Thanks for the support and I'll keep making stuff!

Matt

PS - I buy Kato too;)


sundowner

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1266
  • Respect: +148
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #77 on: October 27, 2009, 07:41:09 PM »
0
After seeing the sneak peak I have come to the conclusion that there is enough space for FVM and Kato GEVOS. Kato will do there one release for CSX, CP, UP and BNSF and that will be it. The thing is that FVM could do all the other version that Kato will not do with what FVM has been shown already.
Which ever side of the track I am on is the right side.

ljudice

  • Guest
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #78 on: October 27, 2009, 07:58:06 PM »
0
Thanks Matt - I'm in for a pair of KCS and Ferromex GEVOS!




sschaer

  • Guest
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #79 on: October 28, 2009, 06:12:51 AM »
0
quite confusing. so kato and fvm will bring out gevos.


but who will bring out correct (numberboards) cp rail units first ??

hopefully either manufacturer opts for unnumbered models as well. at least that's what i would order.

nscalesteve

  • Guest
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #80 on: October 28, 2009, 01:25:38 PM »
0
PS - I buy Kato too;)

at least one Kato AC4400CW you did for sure...  ;)

Ian MacMillan

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12034
  • Gender: Male
  • Learn to use the god damn search feature!
  • Respect: +167
    • Conrail's Amoskeag Northern Division
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #81 on: October 28, 2009, 03:44:45 PM »
0
This is too ridiculous to make up:

http://www.nscale.net/forums/showthread.php?p=127246

If its true or not I dont know but I read this over here (2nd to last post)-> http://www.cp-forum.net/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=251

Well um Matt posts here so why not let him answer the question instead of the model choo choo rumor mill...

Oh wait...he already F'n did...in page 5 of this thread.

Quote
Ahhh, the fun of forums, lots of speculation -

Not sure why Kato was entitled to the GEVO, sure they have a motor and wheels and certainly could have made one, but they choose the SD70ACE. I knew someone wanted to do this model (was my first choice too) and  decided to announce a GEVO. Not only did I announce it, I showed it to everybody, in actual 3D that you could pick up and hold, in June, in Portland. Now, if you want facts (that can be backed up by most in attendance BTW) EVERYONE from the Kato booth spent considerable time at the FVM booth, including my friend Hiroshi. Collectively they spent well over an hour studying and taking several dozen photos. Similar behavior at NMRA in Hartford. Now in a rush, they announce GEVO's, but  with no details at all. So FVM has an actual model well before any hint from Kato, they study my models - take photos (of an actual product), and now announce it. You could say they are copying an existing model. And why, they could have done another unit. It's all Ok though. They made a specific choice to proceed and we will both do just fine. No hard feelings to my friends there as I expected this. Still a fan and still purchase their products. Even help promote them (did anyone even wonder who sent the info out of iHobby?)

And now there is a PWRS entanglement? Cool! Gotta like rumors. Did they lobby (along with lots of customers) for a low number board version? Sure. They even helped persuade me to make one (as seen earlier in this thread - details and roads soon). I've had the drawings for a few months now, but alas, it all belongs to FVM. It was going to be announced this winter, but now y'all have a sneak peek. (BTW U 18, adding this new cab, combined with the other parts will bring this loco to 9 different versions).

So there's the fact check for today. More details on future roads soon. But for now, have to get back to work on the next big thing, details soon.

Best regards,

Matt
« Last Edit: October 28, 2009, 03:47:17 PM by Ian MacMillan »
I WANNA SEE THE BOAT MOVIE!

Yes... I'm in N... Also HO and 1:1

DrifterNL

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 58
  • Respect: 0
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #82 on: October 28, 2009, 04:24:31 PM »
0
I should have rote “I didn’t know if it’s true or not”.
I posted what I read on an other forum and it was never my intention to start any rumors.
My apologies.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2009, 07:16:58 PM by DrifterNL »

sschaer

  • Guest
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #83 on: October 28, 2009, 05:08:27 PM »
0
there are always people who deny what they agreed/promised.




lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4586
  • Respect: +885
    • My train pics
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #84 on: October 28, 2009, 05:41:02 PM »
0
Name one RTR plastic locomotive done in N that is accurate for CP? Maybe the Kato AC4400, but I bet someting is not correct on it. I'm pretty sure even the TLT RS10 and RS18 are not accurate (fuel tank), and the Hobbycraft/LL chopped GP7/9 is not correct since all CP 1500 and 1600 series units have the DB intakes and exhaust blanked out. I wouldn't complain about the FVM not being accurate given that really, nothing in 100% accurate for CP.

Matt G

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 29
  • Respect: 0
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #85 on: October 28, 2009, 06:22:38 PM »
0
there are always people who deny what they agreed/promised.




Interested, please expand!

Matt


Ryan87

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 799
  • Gender: Male
  • Stay thirsty my friend...
  • Respect: 0
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #86 on: October 28, 2009, 06:57:06 PM »
0
the Hobbycraft/LL chopped GP7/9 is not correct

Just because it is only correct for three units doesn't mean it's not correct...  :)

as for the TLT RS18.... we wont talk about that...  :D
Swimming in a sea of Action Red...

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4586
  • Respect: +885
    • My train pics
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #87 on: October 28, 2009, 08:14:39 PM »
0
the Hobbycraft/LL chopped GP7/9 is not correct

Just because it is only correct for three units doesn't mean it's not correct...  :)

as for the TLT RS18.... we wont talk about that...  :D

I think they're correct for more than just the three from the 70's. They are correct (or moreso atleast) for the 8200's, but not for the yard goats. Still, my point was, nothing is 100% accurate for CP.

Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #88 on: October 29, 2009, 05:10:06 AM »
0
You could say they are copying an existing model.
Best regards,

Matt



One could say your model is a copy of the existing T55 HO model  ;)

Their's markedly different phases of GEVOs, so if Kato does the later phases (the ones that, no offense, are foobs on your model) then the market wins.  If they do the same phase, which would be ********, but this is Kato afer all, then the market loses. 

train1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 304
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +8
Re: Kato Gevo
« Reply #89 on: October 29, 2009, 08:25:20 AM »
0

 We should be happy that not one but two esteemed manufacturers are going to put product like this out. They are long overdue and I don't care if the rivet count is wrong. Just make them run flawlessly..... and...... Thank You in advance for giving us more N Scale. ;D