Author Topic: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's  (Read 3080 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

James Costello

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1954
  • Respect: +534
June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« on: May 20, 2009, 06:57:31 PM »
0
Looks like June is going to be a bad month for the wallet:



Kato's site has been updated to show the first run of the SD70ACe's (UP#1, UP#2 and DRGW Heritage), the Wartime GS-4 and the red PRR GG1 as shipping on 05/28. The remaining ACe's shouldn't be too far behind.

Atlas's C40-8W was also due to ship on 05/18 which should also arrive in shops in June.

Brace yourselves!

 
James Costello
Espee into the 90's

flight2000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 795
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +370
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2009, 08:02:05 PM »
0
I think there will be time to recover in between.  The Atlas locos should hit the shelves towards the end of June.  I always figure at least 30-40 days for shipping the container from China to the east coast and then another week to off load and begin shipping from Atlas.  My guess is we won't see them until the 4th of July.  Unfortunately, my pusher will probably hold the Kato's and ship them together with the 40CW's, which is sure to give Mr. Wallet a heart attack either way....  ::)

Brian
I've never met a covered hopper I didn't like.... :)
My (HO) NW Ohio Layout Feed: https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=57633.msg793742#msg793742

TiVoPrince

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5156
  • Respect: +4
    • http://www.technologywrangler.com
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2009, 09:10:18 PM »
0
Harder
every day to stay true to '1984'...
Support fine modeling

davefoxx

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12329
  • Gender: Male
  • TRW Plaid Member
  • Respect: +8534
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2009, 09:35:18 PM »
0
Harder
every day to stay true to '1984'...

Oh man, I hear you.  I fear that my modeled era is about to move from 1983-84 to 1991-92.  Crap.  It already went from 1970-71 to 1983-84 within the last several months.  This is getting expensive.

Dave

A Proud HOer
BUY ALL THE TRAINS!
Still General Counsel to the Laurel Valley Ry.

John

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 13993
  • Respect: +4175
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2009, 09:50:49 PM »
0
Harder
every day to stay true to '1984'...

Oh man, I hear you.  I fear that my modeled era is about to move from 1983-84 to 1991-92.  Crap.  It already went from 1970-71 to 1983-84 within the last several months.  This is getting expensive.

Dave

but look at the bright side .. you just need to weather your rolling stock more ..

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16551
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +7432
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2009, 08:29:10 AM »
0
I hate those M.U. hoses... they look like a pack of frozen hot dogs or something.

No E.R. visit for Mr. Wallet at my house...  I'm still trying to cough up the bones for my last order! :-X

Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4585
  • Respect: +885
    • My train pics
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2009, 09:19:40 AM »
0
Harder
every day to stay true to '1984'...

Oh man, I hear you.  I fear that my modeled era is about to move from 1983-84 to 1991-92.  Crap.  It already went from 1970-71 to 1983-84 within the last several months.  This is getting expensive.

Dave

I hear that! I went back from the present era to 1987-89. Now I have 17 RC racks that I have to somehow re-decal to the old TT from TTX... and 19 that are too modern (TFM, UP Building America, new image CP, etc). I also have a plethora of Kato stack cars, Atlas articulated autoracks, 5161's, and other IM covered hoppers that are superfluous to my needs. And now my SD75I's, C44-9W's, AC4400, SD90MAC's are too modern as well.

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5383
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +2149
    • Modutrak
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2009, 09:48:53 AM »
0
When did Kato learn how to focus a camera?   :D

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26027
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11442
    • Conrail 1285
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2009, 09:52:42 AM »
0
But those trees!!! AARRGGHHH MY EYES!!!!

wm3798

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 16551
  • Gender: Male
  • I like models. She likes antiques. Perfect!
  • Respect: +7432
    • Western Maryland Railway Western Lines
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2009, 09:59:33 AM »
0
And how about the dubbed in headlights?  Are they using yellow LED's? Yikes!

Fortunately, I'm still firmly entrenched in 1971!

Lee
Rockin' It Old School

Lee Weldon www.wmrywesternlines.net

GaryHinshaw

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6752
  • Respect: +2622
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2009, 11:56:56 AM »
0
Well, I'm looking forward to these units, but there is NOTHING in that picture that would prompt me to seek these out (could have used a little less focus, in this case...).  They should just stick to roster shots.


wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8945
  • Respect: +1381
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2009, 12:27:33 PM »
0
I'm sure all the problems were just reasonable compromises, ya know, good enough is good enough.  The paint job is the most outstanding feature of this model, if thay had botched that, then you guys would have valid complaints.  And as long as the model appears to be 98% correct, everyone should just wet their pants.


That's how it goes right?  I'm just learning.  :P


Jason

Ryan87

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 799
  • Gender: Male
  • Stay thirsty my friend...
  • Respect: 0
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2009, 12:29:31 PM »
0
I'm sure all the problems were just reasonable compromises, ya know, good enough is good enough.  The paint job is the most outstanding feature of this model, if thay had botched that, then you guys would have valid complaints.  And as long as the model appears to be 98% correct, everyone should just wet their pants.
That's how it goes right?  I'm just learning.  :P
Jason

Nice!!   :D
Swimming in a sea of Action Red...

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11826
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +925
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2009, 12:32:25 PM »
0
Harder
every day to stay true to '1984'...

I am safely stuck in 1974 (or was it 1973?) and/or 1955. 8)



Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26027
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11442
    • Conrail 1285
Re: June: ACe's versus C40-8W's
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2009, 01:26:17 PM »
0
Plus, the tight curve doesn't do it any favors either.

They really need to just hire me for this crap...