Author Topic: C39-8  (Read 4765 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ljudice

  • Guest
C39-8
« on: May 03, 2009, 04:50:44 PM »
0
Anyone try building a C39-8 using the Atlas C40-8...  ???


Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: C39-8
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2009, 05:02:19 PM »
0
About the only thing you could use would be the mechanism...

ljudice

  • Guest
Re: C39-8
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2009, 05:21:18 PM »
0
Well it's a start....       :'(


Hyperion

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 992
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +19
Re: C39-8
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2009, 05:51:36 PM »
0
If you want to build a correct one, as Robbman said, the frame would be it.

It's on my plate to do a Camelback foobie though with just a different cab and perhaps some other minor differences like the fuel tank.  But I haven't gotten around to doing anything with it yet.  I've got the parts to do it I'm sure, I own several of most every cab (and most other spare parts) Atlas makes, I just kind of petered out on MRR as I often do temporarily.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2009, 05:53:59 PM by Hyperion »
-Mark

ljudice

  • Guest
Re: C39-8
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2009, 06:28:40 PM »
0
That was kind of my idea as well...  I think I'll wait until the bodyshell is out to try fitting things to see how they could work.

kiwi_al

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1472
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +468
Re: C39-8
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2009, 09:50:08 PM »
0
No but I'm in the middle of doing a B39-8 - ATSF,  a bit like Tony Hammes BN one.

Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: C39-8
« Reply #6 on: May 04, 2009, 01:14:06 AM »
0
Well it's a start....       :'(



I may design one for M4D to do as a run for me... but it wouldn't be cheap.

ljudice

  • Guest
Re: C39-8
« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2009, 06:23:35 AM »
0
One NS, one CR would probably be enough for me...

Hyperion

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 992
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +19
Re: C39-8
« Reply #8 on: May 04, 2009, 07:00:22 PM »
0
I'd buy 2 shells if you can get it done, provided they were reasonable, maybe something in the range of $50/ea
-Mark

Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: C39-8
« Reply #9 on: May 04, 2009, 07:38:05 PM »
0
Given that it would be a bodyshell, sill and cab... I doubt $50 would cover it...

ljudice

  • Guest
Re: C39-8
« Reply #10 on: May 04, 2009, 08:30:06 PM »
0
Robbman...

I know you know the Model RR business well, so this may be a dumb suggestion. But I wonder if there is a market for a $200-250 finished model like this. People pay this kind of $$ for Fleischmann locos and some Minitrix models all the time. There is no way Atlas is going to do it. And frankly I'd rather have something based on a known mechanism than the Overland stuff - and besides they would charge $700 for such a model.

My point is - is there a market for a RTR, semi-custom model like this?

Lou


Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: C39-8
« Reply #11 on: May 04, 2009, 09:22:25 PM »
0
I doubt there is a mass-market... a market yes... but wether that market is enough to viably do it is a question that no one can definatively answer.

Even in HO scale, Kaslo still hasn't gotten enough reservations to do one, and it's been waffled around for some 4 years now...

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26030
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11454
    • Conrail 1285
Re: C39-8
« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2009, 09:30:40 PM »
0
I think it's more of one of those "find someone who'll pay $500 for one, then a couple more at $200, and it's almost worth it" situations.

What we really need is some model railroad NEA money. Hmm...

ljudice

  • Guest
Re: C39-8
« Reply #13 on: May 04, 2009, 10:00:53 PM »
0
Wait a minute, I assume these massive steamers from Athearn, etc. all cost over $200...

I know nothing of the economics here - but if there was a run of say 1000 C39-8's - 2 roadnames and two numbers each (250 pieces), for $199, wouldn't they sell out?


bobcat

  • Guest
Re: C39-8
« Reply #14 on: May 04, 2009, 10:16:01 PM »
0
I've gotten the impression lately that a lot of runs of locos are in the 100's per road, not 1000's. I could be wrong.