Author Topic: New trainworx steel drop bottoms  (Read 2667 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gunner

  • Guest
New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« on: March 11, 2009, 09:00:43 AM »
0
Just read my email and had a newsletter from Pat Sanders.  Steel drop bottom gons in N&W in 6 numbers along with others.  They look pretty nice and will go with the dozen in the project box waiting for lettering.  I know that are not a perfect match for what N&W ran, but I'm of the mindset that they are close enough for me.

http://www.train-worx.com/gon.n&w.htm

Getting ready to drop my order this afternoon.

Bob
« Last Edit: March 11, 2009, 09:02:25 AM by gunner »

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11824
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +921
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2009, 10:50:51 AM »
0
Yeah, two months after I posted my plan for the undec versions they announce this hehe

http://therailwire.net/smf/index.php/topic,17421.15.html

They will be lettered as N&W class G-11. It's a bit of a stretch, as the model is about 5 feet to short in length, and a bit low. On the other hand this may be as close to a correct model as we'll get in N scale (I plan to get a couple).

Proto photo:

http://spec.lib.vt.edu/imagebase/norfolksouthern/full/ns1814.jpeg

I'm selling one of my UNDECs in the Trading forum if anyone is interested.

Mark


Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2009, 07:21:37 PM »
0
Trainworx... the king of foobs...

It's 8 feet too short, and over a foot too low... and is missing the forty Wine locks as well.  That's worse than trying to sell a quad hopper as an Ortner... oh wait...


Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11824
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +921
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2009, 11:15:00 PM »
0
Trainworx... the king of foobs...

It's 8 feet too short,

Hell musta froze over, cuz I'm correcting Robb ...  :o

The G-11 was 48'6" inside/50'2" outside according to Dow's book.

The Trainwx gon is 46' according to the site (http://www.train-worx.com/gon.undec.htm)

So assuming that the 46' is the inside dimension, then the Trainworx gon is 2.5' too short in length. ;)

But it's still a foobie, and all the other stuff Robb pointed out still holds.

Mark
« Last Edit: March 11, 2009, 11:48:21 PM by NandW »


Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5383
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +2149
    • Modutrak
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2009, 05:25:15 PM »
0
Trainworx... the king of foobs...

It's 8 feet too short, and over a foot too low... and is missing the forty Wine locks as well.  That's worse than trying to sell a quad hopper as an Ortner... oh wait...



You know what the difference between Trainworx foobies and other (MTL) foobies is?  I can still buy the correct cars in a whole bunch of numbers.  I don't care how many foobies they make to help amortize tooling, as long as I can buy the prototype cars first. 

Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2009, 05:49:21 PM »
0
Trainworx... the king of foobs...

It's 8 feet too short,

Hell musta froze over, cuz I'm correcting Robb ...  :o

The G-11 was 48'6" inside/50'2" outside according to Dow's book.

The Trainwx gon is 46' according to the site (http://www.train-worx.com/gon.undec.htm)

So assuming that the 46' is the inside dimension, then the Trainworx gon is 2.5' too short in length. ;)

But it's still a foobie, and all the other stuff Robb pointed out still holds.

Mark


That 46' has to be overall.  Compre the truck wheelbase (58") to the inside length on any of the photos and it comes out to near 40'. 

Erik W

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1019
  • Respect: +796
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2009, 06:13:32 PM »
0
Trainworx... the king of foobs...

It's 8 feet too short, and over a foot too low... and is missing the forty Wine locks as well.  That's worse than trying to sell a quad hopper as an Ortner... oh wait...



You know what the difference between Trainworx foobies and other (MTL) foobies is?  I can still buy the correct cars in a whole bunch of numbers.  I don't care how many foobies they make to help amortize tooling, as long as I can buy the prototype cars first. 
Agreed.  D&RGW versions on my layout look nice. 

Erik

gunner

  • Guest
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2009, 07:54:01 PM »
0
Foobie or not it's N&W.  I'm just happy to get something already painted in N&W.  I already knew that it was a stand in, but I could wait a young mans lifetime to get something closer and I'm not young anymore!

Bob

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11824
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +921
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #8 on: March 13, 2009, 11:27:53 AM »
0
Trainworx... the king of foobs...

It's 8 feet too short,

Hell musta froze over, cuz I'm correcting Robb ...  :o

The G-11 was 48'6" inside/50'2" outside according to Dow's book.

The Trainwx gon is 46' according to the site (http://www.train-worx.com/gon.undec.htm)

So assuming that the 46' is the inside dimension, then the Trainworx gon is 2.5' too short in length. ;)

But it's still a foobie, and all the other stuff Robb pointed out still holds.

Mark


That 46' has to be overall.  Compre the truck wheelbase (58") to the inside length on any of the photos and it comes out to near 40'. 

Since I happen to have a couple undecs I measured it this morning. From top outer edge of the body to top outer edge it measures 46' 6".

Mark


Denver Road Doug

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2120
  • Respect: +29
    • Mockingbird Industrial
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #9 on: March 13, 2009, 06:33:19 PM »
0
Trainworx... the king of foobs...

It's 8 feet too short, and over a foot too low... and is missing the forty Wine locks as well.  That's worse than trying to sell a quad hopper as an Ortner... oh wait...



You know what the difference between Trainworx foobies and other (MTL) foobies is?  I can still buy the correct cars in a whole bunch of numbers.  I don't care how many foobies they make to help amortize tooling, as long as I can buy the prototype cars first. 

Agreed.  Just like the FVM coal hoppers, we could just say piss on 'em and wait another 20 years for that EXACT model to come around, or we can take the hand we're dealt.  (I'll admit it would be nice for FVM to get the artwork right on at least ONE of their RD-4 releases before it's all said and done!) 

I'm pretty sure I'll be dead-and-gone before accurate hi-side Thrall coal gons reach the market and I'm a pretty healthy 36 years old.  Yet, I have some of the MDC's, even though they're hideous.  I'm guessing the 60 year-old n-scaler that saw these when they were released and said, "nah I'll wait" was calling Dr. Kevorkian when Athearn released the same 25 year-old tooling in the mid-2000's.
NOTE: I'm no longer active on this forum.   If you need to contact me, use the e-mail address (or visit the website link) attached to this username.  Thanks.

Robbman

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3007
  • Respect: +18
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #10 on: March 13, 2009, 09:53:43 PM »
0
Trainworx... the king of foobs...

It's 8 feet too short,

Hell musta froze over, cuz I'm correcting Robb ...  :o

The G-11 was 48'6" inside/50'2" outside according to Dow's book.

The Trainwx gon is 46' according to the site (http://www.train-worx.com/gon.undec.htm)

So assuming that the 46' is the inside dimension, then the Trainworx gon is 2.5' too short in length. ;)

But it's still a foobie, and all the other stuff Robb pointed out still holds.

Mark


That 46' has to be overall.  Compre the truck wheelbase (58") to the inside length on any of the photos and it comes out to near 40'. 

Since I happen to have a couple undecs I measured it this morning. From top outer edge of the body to top outer edge it measures 46' 6".

Mark


What was the inside length?

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11824
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +921
Re: New trainworx steel drop bottoms
« Reply #11 on: March 14, 2009, 08:44:22 AM »
0