Author Topic: Micro-trains pet peeves poll  (Read 6248 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8945
  • Respect: +1381
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« on: June 01, 2008, 04:12:13 PM »
0
Since it's a monthly routine to dump on Micro-trains. ;D  I thought it would be interesting to see what is the most offensive, plus I don't want to clean the house so I'm looking busy on my computer.  I'm sure I missed many personal choices, maybe I can add them in.

This would be much better as a ranking poll but it is what it is.  :-*

You can pick your top three.


Jason

tom mann

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 10917
  • Representing The Railwire on The Railwire
  • Respect: +1014
    • http://www.chicagoswitching.com
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2008, 04:18:42 PM »
0
This may be of interest to MT.

TiVoPrince

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5156
  • Respect: +4
    • http://www.technologywrangler.com
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2008, 04:23:15 PM »
0
Forgot
the fanboy option:Micro-Trains are just perfect for collecting, accumulating, speculating just as they are, don't change a thing...
Support fine modeling

bobcat

  • Guest
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2008, 04:41:21 PM »
0
My biggest pet peeve with MT these days is not making trucks available with low profile wheels in bulk packs.

I need to purchase a few bulk packs but I have been holding out to when they come with low profile wheels. I think it is a sham that I should have to purchase new trucks and then wheels for the ones I will throw out. >:(

Mark5

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11839
  • Always with the negative waves Moriarty ...
  • Respect: +929
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2008, 05:03:06 PM »
0
My main peeve is that when they do make an N&W car, they get the lettering wrong. How hard is it to get it right? They must delete my emails ... >:(


absnut

  • Guest
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2008, 05:33:34 PM »
0
I'm surprised no one has mentioned "slinky effect" (which reall doesn't bother me).  ;D

Dick

wcfn100

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8945
  • Respect: +1381
    • Chicago Great Western Modeler
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2008, 05:53:38 PM »
0
Those are both good ones.  I should have thought of them.  I would add them in but I don't think you can change you vote.

edit- I would have to reset to zero and I'm sure no one is interested in that.

Jason

tokenbrit

  • Guest
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #7 on: June 01, 2008, 06:41:52 PM »
0
Forgot
the fanboy option:Micro-Trains are just perfect for collecting, accumulating, speculating just as they are, don't change a thing...
Prefer this one: buy what you want; ignore the rest ... & don't worry about it - call it the 'lazyboy option' ;D

fieromike

  • Guest
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2008, 09:20:27 PM »
0
The passenger trucks, 4 & 6 wheel, are due for a retool.  The detail level on them is just a step above the old Arnold stuff.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12223
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +11641
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2008, 09:28:40 PM »
0
Body color is also an issue...

The MTL PRR and CR freight car colors are too brown.  I also had to fade the crap out of a Micro Trains PC boxcar that was way too dark - the prototype was a very early NYC-built car that got NYC Jade Green instead of PC Green, but Micro-Trains' car was even dark for PC Green.

I, for one, don't mind the occasional one-of-a-kind scheme from MTL.  Atlas does a fine job with the everyday runners.

But RIDE HEIGHT...!  It pains me to see a fishbelly gon sailing yards above the railhead... :P

Frank Amato

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1407
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +930
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2008, 09:51:21 PM »
0
Damn!  Only 4% want a 7-foot and 9-foot door option on the PS-1?  IMO, that goes hand-in-hand with the "wrong prototype" selection.  There's a TON of PS-1 options that MT could do accurately with some tweaks to the tooling.  Maybe since the PS-1 is so old it's not feasible to update?

It's still a great car, but the details limit the proto options...

  Frank

3rdrail

  • Guest
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2008, 11:56:48 AM »
0
I knew something looked "wrong" about the Santa Fe flatcars offered this month. They come equipped with archbar trucks, OK until about 1940, but also have a side mounted Ajax brake wheel. Properly, the cars would have a fold down vertical shaft, horizontal wheel handbrake. I suppose this is another "close enough".

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26039
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11475
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2008, 01:19:44 PM »
0
And the steel plate loads that would probably DEMOLISH those cars.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26039
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11475
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #13 on: June 02, 2008, 01:20:32 PM »
0
But then again, it's just par for the course. I think David and I summed up my feelings here:
http://ttamt.blogspot.com/

tokenbrit

  • Guest
Re: Micro-trains pet peeves poll
« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2008, 04:04:54 PM »
0
I knew something looked "wrong" about the Santa Fe flatcars offered this month. They come equipped with archbar trucks, OK until about 1940, but also have a side mounted Ajax brake wheel. Properly, the cars would have a fold down vertical shaft, horizontal wheel handbrake. I suppose this is another "close enough".
Wonder how many people caught that; would catch that; would be bothered by that? I know Ed (& others) might disagree, but sometimes close enough IS good enough, imho ... it often is for Gov't work - why can't it be for a 'reduced reality' / MTL world?

Is there really an N-scale product out there that is perfect in all details, or are we each just deciding on what level of imperfection we notice / know about / are prepared to put up with?

I guess that's why we have 'rule 1' :)



PS "par" is actually a pretty good score ;)