Author Topic: MTL Blows it Again...NOT!  (Read 3969 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tom mann

  • Administrator
  • Crew
  • *****
  • Posts: 10917
  • Representing The Railwire on The Railwire
  • Respect: +1014
    • http://www.chicagoswitching.com
Re: MTL Blows it Again...NOT!
« Reply #15 on: March 29, 2008, 08:38:08 AM »
0
Three thoughts, and then I'm off to weather.
3)  Replacing the MT trucks with 100ton Atlas trucks and 36" FVM wheels make for an awesome car.

what does that do to ride height?

It lowers it just enough that FVM or NWSL wheels are required because anything else rubs against the bays.

3rdrail

  • Guest
Re: MTL Blows it Again...NOT!
« Reply #16 on: March 29, 2008, 10:12:51 AM »
0
Chris, there was a Struthers, Pennsylvania, on the PRR, right outside of Warren, PA. The Ethyl Corporation, Baton Rouge, LA, which I called on for the PRR and PC, had storage in transit at Struthers for the oil refinery there to keep cars of tetraethyl lead ready.

Denver Road Doug

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2120
  • Respect: +29
    • Mockingbird Industrial
Re: MTL Blows it Again...NOT!
« Reply #17 on: April 28, 2008, 12:58:38 AM »
0
Just thought I'd comment on another similar car I came across.  I was thumbing through the BN Color Guide to Freight and Passenger Equipment by David G. Casdorph and on page 45 it shows an ex-Frisco Magor car that looks very close to this Milwaukee car.  A quick job would be to remove the Milwaukee Road lettering, reporting marks, and road numbers and replace with BN reporting marks and numbers.  (there was no logo on the car in the book, just B N reporting marks and 439 514 for the number.)  From the book, the BN series is 439500-439599.  I'm still gonna do a little more research to see if these were in captive service or otherwise what they were used for.  (mainly, were they used for standard grain service and/or did they commonly show up in Texas)

Obviously, it could make for an interesting Frisco car as well, although there is absolutely no trace of any Frisco logo so it would be interesting to see what it looked like as an SLSF car.  (the series, again from the Casdorph BN Color Guide, is 86000-86099)

Any suggestions about the best way to remove the black MT lettering without jacking with the aluminum finish? 
NOTE: I'm no longer active on this forum.   If you need to contact me, use the e-mail address (or visit the website link) attached to this username.  Thanks.

ljudice

  • Guest
Re: MTL Blows it Again...NOT!
« Reply #18 on: April 28, 2008, 10:23:35 PM »
0
For May:

http://rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=1060012
http://www.nscaledivision.com/images/Micro-Trains%20Images/MTL%20Runner%20Pack%2022%2050'%20Gondolas%20SOU.jpg

I know there are two lettering possibilities for SOU gons, but this is too small, and has a rectangular "O" with a green light - which is wrong!


Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26033
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11460
    • Conrail 1285
Re: MTL Blows it Again...NOT!
« Reply #19 on: April 28, 2008, 10:58:00 PM »
0
I bet they have a pic of a one-off or something like that... they love those.

Sokramiketes

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5385
  • Better modeling through peer pressure...
  • Respect: +2149
    • Modutrak
Re: MTL Blows it Again...NOT!
« Reply #20 on: April 28, 2008, 11:35:58 PM »
0
I bet they have a pic of a one-off or something like that... they love those.

The guys (gals?) who pick the schemes don't know anything about trains... or at least that's what it sounds like from Joe's post here:

http://www.trainboard.com/grapevine/showthread.php?p=491551#post491551


Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 26033
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +11460
    • Conrail 1285
Re: MTL Blows it Again...NOT!
« Reply #21 on: April 28, 2008, 11:46:53 PM »
0
Telling... ever so telling...

pfs

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 571
  • HPI 1975-?
  • Respect: +5
Re: MTL Blows it Again...NOT!
« Reply #22 on: April 29, 2008, 12:29:12 AM »
0
I bet they have a pic of a one-off or something like that... they love those.

The guys (gals?) who pick the schemes don't know anything about trains... or at least that's what it sounds like from Joe's post here:

http://www.trainboard.com/grapevine/showthread.php?p=491551#post491551




From the link......

"......unless you are a huge diesel nerd and lacking a life like myself...it's difficult to tell the differences especially if your exposure to the designs is limited. The Marketing Assistant may have found a shot that was mislabled as well..."

Wow, I wish I could be half a$$ in my business. I thought their product was Train related items, one would think that understanding/knowing/researching the items your company is 'attempting' to replicate would be "good business"......or not.

pfffffft!


ljudice

  • Guest
Re: MTL Blows it Again...NOT!
« Reply #23 on: May 01, 2008, 09:23:08 PM »
0
In case you don't follow Trainboard (and who doesn't???), MTL has taken my suggestion and fixed the graphics on the SOU gon runner pack!

Hurray for MTL! They do listen!

Lou