Author Topic: Making Kato Couplers Compatible with More Common Couplers  (Read 733 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rickb773

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 601
  • Gender: Male
  • Rickb773
  • Respect: +1061
    • Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines
Making Kato Couplers Compatible with More Common Couplers
« on: October 31, 2025, 05:21:29 PM »
0
This is one of the most helpful videos I have run across.
I have not seen it on this forum before, so I'll reference it here.
(If it is a duplicate feel free to delete this thread.)

I've always loved the performance of Kato engines but hated having to deal with their couplers.
They were a royal pain to attempt to couple with other manufacturer's couplers.
I usually hand (0-5-0) coupled a dummy car to the engine and then added a "normal" train.

@Veekerstudios published a 3-minute YouTube video on how to solve the coupler issues.
I've tried it and it works, so I have modified all my Kato engines.


Keep 'em runnin',
Rick

turbowhiz

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 357
  • https://n-possible.com
  • Respect: +742
    • N-Possible
Re: Making Kato Couplers Compatible with More Common Couplers
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2025, 06:41:43 PM »
+4
As a coupler public service announcement, note that you will give up some draft-buff-draft reliablity if you modify your Kato couplers as depicted in the video above on your Kato-MTL joints; The extension’s purpose is to make the Kato coupler joints more reliable with MTL couplers ironically. I’ve tested this so it’s not just theory. Depending on your own needs, it might be a worthwhile tradeoff, and Kato couplers vary a great deal model design to model design. I’m guessing the knub size has varied from design/and or run, given how Kato does couplers, but I’ve not researched this. If you only run your trains forward and you don’t have any hesitation events, all good chop away. But if you find automatic coupling an issue on your specific model and need reliable MTL joints in more challenging circumstances, try filing down the knub a bit before entirely removing it, and you should end up solving the problem without creating another.




peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35271
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6640
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Making Kato Couplers Compatible with More Common Couplers
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2025, 09:32:34 AM »
+1
While I absolutely agree that Kato knuckle couplers are not my favorite, I have had no problems converting them to MTL couplers. The coupler design in Kato locos allows for a pretty easy MTL conversion. 
. . . 42 . . .

robert3985

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3552
  • Respect: +1928
Re: Making Kato Couplers Compatible with More Common Couplers
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2025, 05:41:22 PM »
+4
While I absolutely agree that Kato knuckle couplers are not my favorite, I have had no problems converting them to MTL couplers. The coupler design in Kato locos allows for a pretty easy MTL conversion.

I haven't had any problems converting Kato locos to MTL Z-scale couplers in the past (or MTL N-scale couplers in the long long past) either. 

However, the past is the past, and now all of my engines, whether Kato or otherwise, and all of my cars will be wearing N-possible couplers.

Goodbye slinky effect, goodbye magnetic dongles, goodbye non-prototypical size and looks...and good riddance

Cheerio!
Bob Gilmore