Author Topic: Building smaller code rail?  (Read 4477 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

svedblen

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 644
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +349
    • Three Yards Yard - beware - it is H0 - No, now it's O
Re: Building smaller code rail?
« Reply #15 on: September 08, 2012, 10:03:50 AM »
0
I actually built a code 40 turnout using detailing parts from Proto:87 a few years ago. It was fun to build, as a one-time-project, but I would not build any larger quantities.

But I long to see more brave attempts at small and fine scaling modeling.

/Lennart
« Last Edit: September 08, 2012, 10:07:00 AM by svedblen »
Lennart

kalbert

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 459
  • Respect: 0
Re: Building smaller code rail?
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2012, 01:09:03 PM »
0
Further to the handlaid lack of detail problem, I have found that it's effective to use 100% PCB ties when using small flat wire, and to remove all of the copper except for small "pads" under the rail to simulate tie plates. The drawback is that it's a lot of work, not something you'd want to do for smiles of track and dozens of turnouts. Here's an N scale turnout laid using Code 25 flatwire rail using this technique:



The turnout is not yet finished--still to be done is to fill in the openings in the frog flageways.

That's just ridiculous!!!!  Very nice work though  :D