Author Topic: Micro-Trains Heavyweight for CBQ Question  (Read 1145 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CBQ Fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3528
  • Respect: +389
Micro-Trains Heavyweight for CBQ Question
« on: June 02, 2012, 09:05:51 AM »
0
I have been doing some research and I am looking for some confirmation.

It looks like the Q had 7 cars under Plan 3410/3410A

They were named:
McKight
McNab
Mt Lyell
McLeansboro
Mackenzie
McQuesten
McKinnell

According to the N Sclae Varnish site the MT 12-1 sleeper is a 3410/3410A sleeper also.  So are these not the same cars and if not what is the difference and how do you tell.  Why would MT be unable to do a run of this car with the Q names above and appropriate markings?  It does appear that the Q leased these to Pullman but they were still Q owned.

So if my research is accurate I would love to see MT produce at least a handful of the names above so I can round out my Q heavyweight train.
Brian

Way of the Zephyr

jmlaboda - RIP

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: Micro-Trains Heavyweight for CBQ Question
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2012, 04:51:59 PM »
0
To do a run with appropriate markings is simple... take the Pullman green "Pullman" model and apply any of the names (except for Mt. Lyell, which was a 3421N 10 section - solarium lounge so its not even a part of this discussion)... and you can add Anaconda, Maximilian and Wadena to the list as well since these cars were sold to the FW&D... or they can simply paint the model Pullman green with a black roof, put "CB&Q" and a number ([Plan 3410] 620 - 622, [3410A] 625 - 627) on the lower part of the body and there you have it.  In service none of the car types that apply to the "Q" wore "Q" roadnames or reporting marks until they were removed from Pullman lease and was reassigned for use as coaches (listed as dorm cars in ORPTEs).

What may cause some confusion in regards to the Pullmans is the former PULL car Meath, a Plan 2410F 12-1 which has incorrect lettering.  In service as coaches the cars appeared just like the one below with just the reporting mark and number...http://www.northeast.railfan.net/images/cbq621.jpg, a Plan 2410F 12-1 which has incorrect lettering.  In service as coaches the cars appeared just like the one below with just the reporting mark and number...
http://www.northeast.railfan.net/images/cbq621.jpg

The "Betterment" coaches fared better but none can be easily done in N-scale at present, at least not until some sort of core kit comes into being...
« Last Edit: June 02, 2012, 04:54:06 PM by jmlaboda »

CBQ Fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3528
  • Respect: +389
Re: Micro-Trains Heavyweight for CBQ Question
« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2012, 06:04:01 PM »
0
Jim,

Great information, thank you!  Now us Q fans need to lobby MT to make a run.  On a side note I wonder if anyone has talked with micro-scale about creating new runs of decals for all of the heavyweight lines.
Brian

Way of the Zephyr

jmlaboda - RIP

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: Micro-Trains Heavyweight for CBQ Question
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2012, 11:49:51 PM »
0
Just so you know, MT already has the information in hand about the CB&Q Pullmans... hopefully they will consider releasing a name or two...

CBQ Fan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3528
  • Respect: +389
Re: Micro-Trains Heavyweight for CBQ Question
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2012, 08:10:25 PM »
0
Joe, any thoughts on these?????
Brian

Way of the Zephyr