Author Topic: Amfleet comparisons  (Read 7870 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jmlaboda - RIP

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: Amfleet comparisons
« Reply #15 on: May 17, 2011, 07:58:26 PM »
0
Thank you!!!  That's just what I have been looking for... I do appreciate it!!!

David Leonard

  • Guest
Re: Amfleet comparisons
« Reply #16 on: May 17, 2011, 09:55:42 PM »
0
Unless my eyes deceive me, it looks like the Katos have foot stirrups and the Bachmanns do not. From what I can tell this is not a difference between Amfleets I and II.

jmlaboda - RIP

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: Amfleet comparisons
« Reply #17 on: May 18, 2011, 12:55:58 PM »
0
"From what I can tell this is not a difference between Amfleets I and II."

Its a matter of manufacturer, but these should be easily added to the Bachmann models.


jmlaboda - RIP

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: Amfleet comparisons
« Reply #18 on: May 18, 2011, 01:03:06 PM »
0
"I modified my Bachmann trucks to roll just as well though."

Daniel, what did you do to accomplish this?  I know the Bachmanns roll like a brick...

daniel_leavitt2000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6444
  • Respect: +1427
Re: Amfleet comparisons
« Reply #19 on: May 18, 2011, 05:15:01 PM »
0
I cut away as much of the plastic around the wheels as possible, leaving three contact points (the metal tab and two retaining points. I also thinned the retaining tabs into a knife edge so that there is less friction. Finally, I added a lot of conducting lube.

American eyes, American eyes
View the world from American eyes
Bury the past, rob us blind
And leave nothing behind

jmlaboda - RIP

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: Amfleet comparisons
« Reply #20 on: May 18, 2011, 06:49:58 PM »
0
Thanks Daniel!!!