0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ok, that clarifies things -- thanks.But using "peteski logic" it seems to me that the task you were using that airbrush for would be just as easily done with a conventional airbrush and compressor.I think that a self-contained cordless airbrushes would be most useful for tasks where it is not handy to use conventional airbrushes. Things like weathering track, or other features on the layout. It would be easier to do that without having to drag the air hose across the scenery. But OTOH, the compressor/battery unit in most self-contained airbrushes is an unwieldy appendage under the hand-piece. I think that this would make low-angle spraying (like weathering the rails) awkward or even impossible.I guess I expected someone with that type of airbrush to report their experience, but so far nobody used it for that type of task.
MK, you might be disappointed that while the compressor unit is small and portable you don't have control of the air pressure (which to me is important part of using an airbrush over spray can). These things were designed for decorating fingernails.
Peteski, but wouldn't the dual-action airbrush give you some (not total as you would in regulating the compressor) kind of air control?Thanks @samusi01 .