Author Topic: MRC Tech4 280  (Read 1344 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cjp53

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 147
  • Respect: +2
MRC Tech4 280
« on: June 21, 2020, 07:13:36 AM »
0
Have a chance at picking a used one up,a friend was supposed to build me a power pack but things fell through.Who has a 280 and what are your results with it?

Doug G.

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1161
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +58
Re: MRC Tech4 280
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2020, 01:26:12 PM »
0
I don't have a 280, which is a double pack but I have a couple of 260s which are singles and they are great. MRC has never really made a bad power pack.

Doug
Atlas First Generation Motive Power and Treble-O-Lectric. Click on the link:
www.irwinsjournal.com/a1g/a1glocos/

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35224
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6621
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: MRC Tech4 280
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2020, 08:06:00 PM »
0
MRC has never really made a bad power pack.

Doug

LOL! Maybe so, but some DCC decoders (specifically ESU sound decoder) and some  manufacturers sure don't get along with some MRC power packs (not that sound decoders should really ever be used on DC - kind of defeats the purpose of DCC, and all those nifty sound functions).
« Last Edit: June 21, 2020, 08:09:11 PM by peteski »
. . . 42 . . .

Doug G.

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1161
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +58
Re: MRC Tech4 280
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2020, 01:49:32 AM »
0
It's not MRC's responsibility to make sure their DC power packs are compatible with other product for which they are not meant to be used.

Doug
Atlas First Generation Motive Power and Treble-O-Lectric. Click on the link:
www.irwinsjournal.com/a1g/a1glocos/

cjp53

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 147
  • Respect: +2
Re: MRC Tech4 280
« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2020, 08:01:35 AM »
0
I did get that power pack for $22,it has to be better than the MRC1300 and now I can run both tracks at the same time.

cjp53

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 147
  • Respect: +2
Re: MRC Tech4 280
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2020, 03:39:11 PM »
0
Power pack came today and works great,first time I could run both tracks at the same time.Wish I had done it right the first time and knew about the MRC1300 being a problem.Guy who owns the train shops is an old friend and never told me.Live and learn.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35224
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6621
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: MRC Tech4 280
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2020, 03:50:19 PM »
0
Power pack came today and works great,first time I could run both tracks at the same time.Wish I had done it right the first time and knew about the MRC1300 being a problem.Guy who owns the train shops is an old friend and never told me.Live and learn.

He might not even know.
MRC1300 is fine when running any of the DC-only locos (with no DCC decoders in them).  Thos locos basically have a motor and light bulbs (or nowadays maybe LEDs).

But Rapido Trains raised a flag that it appears that when running their models with factory-installed ESU sound decoders decoders using MRC1300 blows up those decoders.  This is the only example I heard of the problem.  No other decoder manufacturers issued any similar  warnings.

Still, running any decoder-equipped models on DC is not really an optimal setup.  Those decoders are more at home under DCC power and control.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2020, 11:00:36 AM by peteski »
. . . 42 . . .

cjp53

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 147
  • Respect: +2
Re: MRC Tech4 280
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2020, 03:54:31 PM »
0
That's true about him not knowing about that problem.When I bought the used power pack I told him I did not run DCC.I don't blame him and did not mean to imply that.Poor choice of words on my part.

Maletrain

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4195
  • Respect: +873
Re: MRC Tech4 280
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2020, 09:51:44 PM »
0
Peteski, I think you typed "DCC only" where you mean "DC only".  But, I don't think that is going to confuse anybody.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35224
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6621
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: MRC Tech4 280
« Reply #9 on: June 27, 2020, 11:02:07 AM »
0
Peteski, I think you typed "DCC only" where you mean "DC only".  But, I don't think that is going to confuse anybody.

Fixed, thanks!  Funny how a "fat-fingered" extra "C" converts DC to DCC. Too bad the real conversion is not that easy.  :)
. . . 42 . . .

Maletrain

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4195
  • Respect: +873
Re: MRC Tech4 280
« Reply #10 on: June 27, 2020, 11:39:27 AM »
0
Fixed, thanks!  Funny how a "fat-fingered" extra "C" converts DC to DCC. Too bad the real conversion is not that easy.  :)

Yeah, especially for guys like me with "fat fingers".