Author Topic: MTL business car  (Read 2427 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Frisco Larry

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 162
  • Respect: +5
MTL business car
« on: September 05, 2017, 04:50:39 PM »
0
Can anyone tell me if the modernized heavyweight business car body that was originally made for Lowell Smith, but is now being issued by MTL (for example the B&O Silver Spring) is based on a real car and if so, what is it?
« Last Edit: September 10, 2017, 10:41:30 PM by GaryHinshaw »

daniel_leavitt2000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6444
  • Respect: +1427
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2017, 05:28:01 PM »
0
Nothing specific I believe. MTL used the same interior as their Observation car which is totally wrong for most business car.
American eyes, American eyes
View the world from American eyes
Bury the past, rob us blind
And leave nothing behind

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9384
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +6187
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2017, 11:44:07 PM »
0
It is not based on an actual prototype.
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net
Bridgeport & New London in N scale


JoeD

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1938
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1389
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2017, 03:54:47 PM »
0
Per his specifications. 

Joe
in my civvies here.  I only represent my grandmothers home made Mac and Cheese on Railwire.

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 35275
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +6644
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2017, 05:32:08 PM »
0
Per his specifications. 

Joe

That makes sense in a weird sort of a way. If the car was modeled after a specific prototype then if it was released painted for some railroad which never owned that car that would make modelers grumble.  But if it is a fantasy car to begin with, no matter what road name it is released in, it will always be a 100% foob. Equally so for every release.  :)
. . . 42 . . .

JoeD

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1938
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1389
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2017, 10:21:16 AM »
+1
That makes sense in a weird sort of a way. If the car was modeled after a specific prototype then if it was released painted for some railroad which never owned that car that would make modelers grumble.  But if it is a fantasy car to begin with, no matter what road name it is released in, it will always be a 100% foob. Equally so for every release.  :)

Clarification...   We are, there for they grumble.   LOL 
in my civvies here.  I only represent my grandmothers home made Mac and Cheese on Railwire.

JMaurer1

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1188
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +307
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2017, 11:33:04 AM »
+1
Better to foob, than not to foob at all...

(would rather have the car than not have the car, even if it is a foob)
Sacramento Valley NRail and NTrak
We're always looking for new members

Point353

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3723
  • Respect: +915
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2017, 03:53:21 PM »
0
Isn't the MTL car a rather close match to one of the cars in the KCS office car fleet?

jmlaboda - RIP

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2017, 09:09:01 PM »
0
Quote
Isn't the MTL car a rather close match to one of the cars in the KCS office car fleet?

Neither model is close to anything.


thomasjmdavis

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4376
  • Respect: +1268
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2017, 10:03:46 PM »
0
Tom D.

I gave up rivet counting when I couldn't see an N scale rivet anymore.

jmlaboda - RIP

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2181
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +162
    • Passenger Car Photo Index
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #11 on: September 10, 2017, 02:18:31 PM »
0

Ike the BN Freak

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1639
  • Respect: +119
Re: MTL business car
« Reply #12 on: September 10, 2017, 07:09:30 PM »
0
When I spoke to Lowell about the car, he stated he wanted a car that looked similar to multiple different protos without matching any one.