Author Topic: IM SD40-2 Speaker Transplant Comparison 3  (Read 1440 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jdcolombo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2394
  • Respect: +1210
IM SD40-2 Speaker Transplant Comparison 3
« on: June 30, 2017, 10:43:29 AM »
+2
Hi everyone.

John "Lemosteam" LeMerise made two 3D-print enclosures available for upgrading the speaker in an IM SD40-2.  One of the enclosures is for a 9x16mm speaker; the other is for an 8x12mm.  I tried out both of them in my "test bed" SD40, and made a video of the results:


To my ears, the 9x16mm speaker sounds best.  I used one of my old stash of Knowles Fox speakers, but the CUI 9x16 (available from Digikey) has almost identical specs to the no-longer-available Fox - it has a bit more lower midrange, which makes the sound a bit more "full" than the 8x12 (a Soberton, also available from Digikey).  Both, however, are a substantial improvement over the stock speaker (just a note that the stock speaker is at a small disadvantage here since I recorded it without the shell on, which would help the sound with a bit more reverb; I no longer have the stock speaker, and couldn't use it anyway given my surgery to replace it, but I can verify that the two replacements DO in fact sound substantially better than the stock one).

Here is a photo of the two enclosures, with speakers in them (the 9x16 is on the left; the 8x12 is on the right):

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Both enclosures fit perfectly in the cutout in the fuel tank of the SD40-2.

For those of you interested in how to do this speaker transplant, here is my original thread on how to do it:
https://www.therailwire.net/forum/index.php?topic=41025.msg509857#msg509857

The enclosures are available here:
https://www.shapeways.com/product/N8M7HBL6Y/2pk-8x12-soberton-offset-speaker-enclosure?optionId=62934409  (8x12)
https://www.shapeways.com/product/W64FT84NN/16x9-spkr-enclos-2pk?optionId=62916866 (9x16)

9x16 CUI and 8x12 Soberton speakers are available from Digikey.

John C.


« Last Edit: June 30, 2017, 10:49:32 AM by jdcolombo »

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9026
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1796
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: IM SD40-2 Speaker Transplant Comparison 3
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2017, 12:07:53 PM »
0
John,
If one were to purchase the non-sound version (say because he couldn't afford the sound version) could on euse this to install the speaker when said upgrade occurred?
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.


jdcolombo

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2394
  • Respect: +1210
Re: IM SD40-2 Speaker Transplant Comparison 3
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2017, 12:30:43 PM »
0
John,
If one were to purchase the non-sound version (say because he couldn't afford the sound version) could on euse this to install the speaker when said upgrade occurred?

Hi Phil.

As long as the non-sound version has the speaker cutout in the frame, then yes.  I'm assuming it does (can't imagine IM would have done two different frames, but I don't own a non-sound version, so I'm not 100% sure).

John C.

CPR9009

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 44
  • Respect: +8
Re: IM SD40-2 Speaker Transplant Comparison 3
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2017, 03:27:39 PM »
0
Non sound versions have the cutout and the holes in the fuel tank just like the sound version.  I have both.

Scott

MK

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4353
  • Respect: +955
Re: IM SD40-2 Speaker Transplant Comparison 3
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2017, 04:58:38 PM »
0
To my ears, the 9x16 sounds SO much better, not unexpected given the larger size.

carlso

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1129
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +514
Re: IM SD40-2 Speaker Transplant Comparison 3
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2017, 09:12:22 PM »
0

John,

thanks for taking the time out of your busy schedule to post these videos. For sure, you are not wasting any talents by being idle but rather very willing to share. Very much appreciated.

OBTW, I too like the 9x16 better, although the smaller is not bad.

Carl
Carl Sowell
El Paso, Texas

Santa Fe Guy

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1096
  • Respect: +359
Re: IM SD40-2 Speaker Transplant Comparison 3
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2017, 11:44:05 PM »
0
Excellent work as usual John and thanks for going to so much trouble for us. The winner to my old ears is 9 x 16 .
Thanks again.
Rod.
Santafesd40.blogspot.com

tehachapifan

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3477
  • Respect: +1148
Re: IM SD40-2 Speaker Transplant Comparison 3
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2017, 12:25:47 AM »
0
Yes, nice comparison, John! I agree the 9x16 sounds the best here.