Author Topic: MT passenger car  (Read 2621 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

trainforfun

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1905
  • Respect: +98
MT passenger car
« on: October 18, 2016, 02:34:18 PM »
0
Would like to know which length of body mount coupler they use on their 6 wheels truck passenger cars ?
Thanks ,
Louis



Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3839
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1378
Re: MT passenger car
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2016, 04:06:28 PM »
0
Would like to know which length of body mount coupler they use on their 6 wheels truck passenger cars ?

1015/1016 depending on the car... for example the diner uses a 1016, the Mail baggage, 12-1, 10-1-2, paired window coach & baggage all use 1015's

the RPO appears to be an exception using a 1023 style coupler.

I don't have any other body styles to confirm what they use...



trainforfun

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1905
  • Respect: +98
Re: MT passenger car
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2016, 04:52:55 PM »
0
Thanks is it marked on it ?
Thanks ,
Louis



Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3839
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1378
Re: MT passenger car
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2016, 04:58:10 PM »
0
Thanks is it marked on it ?

Not that I'm aware of... Its a case of knowing the shape of the coupler boxes. (or spending too much time looking at couplers  ;)) a 1016 box is stretched compared to the 1015 to accommodate the longer shank... and the 1023 is clearly different...

That being said a 1015 will fit on the Diner if your curves are broad enough... as for true scale I haven't had an opportunity to experiment yet, I believe there were suggestions in one of the two threads.  :D

trainforfun

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1905
  • Respect: +98
Re: MT passenger car
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2016, 05:19:08 PM »
0
I am building a Pullman car . It's the Dover Harbor  that I had the great privilege to ride last spring .
It's a 3D print and was wondering what to use to be able to couple with my other cars .
I will not go for the true scale as they are not compatible.
Thanks for your help !!!
Thanks ,
Louis



trainforfun

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1905
  • Respect: +98
Re: MT passenger car
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2016, 04:44:23 PM »
0
Hi
I have on hand and tried a 1015-1 and it's too low .
Is that the difference with a regular 1015 ?

Thanks ,
Louis



Ike the BN Freak

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1639
  • Respect: +119
Re: MT passenger car
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2016, 12:32:26 AM »
0
No, the -1 just means that it is factory assembled vs a kit.

trainforfun

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1905
  • Respect: +98
Re: MT passenger car
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2016, 12:46:48 PM »
0
Ok thanks .
Which one would be like reversed to have the coupler higher than the box ?
Thanks ,
Louis



trainforfun

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1905
  • Respect: +98
Re: MT passenger car
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2016, 02:16:40 PM »
0
I think I need #2004 to have it higher.
 is that right with you guys ?
Thanks ,
Louis



Missaberoad

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3839
  • Gender: Male
  • Ryan in Alberta
  • Respect: +1378
Re: MT passenger car
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2016, 02:27:40 PM »
0
I think I need #2004 to have it higher.
 is that right with you guys ?

yes a 2004 is the underslung coupler...

trainforfun

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 1905
  • Respect: +98
Re: MT passenger car
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2016, 02:28:44 PM »
0
Thanks
Thanks ,
Louis