Author Topic: Atlas FMC 5077 in hand — a couple of quick pics  (Read 1363 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8879
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4708
    • www.bbussey.net
Atlas FMC 5077 in hand — a couple of quick pics
« on: June 25, 2016, 08:39:59 AM »
+1
The new FMC 5077 boxcars arrived yesterday. This is the best iteration of the prototype ever done in N scale and blows away all previous attempts.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
« Last Edit: June 25, 2016, 03:52:34 PM by GaryHinshaw »
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net


ai5629

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 781
  • Respect: +213
Re: Atlas FMC 5077 in hand — a couple of quick pics
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2016, 09:06:26 AM »
0
Very nice indeed!  The ride height looks spot on.  How does it look next to an X58 (the N scale boxcar ride height gold standard)?  How are the body mount pockets done?  Is it incorporated into the floor to achieve proper ride height?  Or is the end slight notched?  Either way is fine with me as long as it sits where it needs to sit.  I plan on ordering some later today.  Thanks.

Jeff
Jeff Lopez

daniel_leavitt2000

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6341
  • Respect: +1296
Re: Atlas FMC 5077 in hand — a couple of quick pics
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2016, 06:04:39 PM »
0
How does it compare to the MTL car? The Fox Valley and MDC cars are both plate C, but I always thought that the MTL could stand in for a plate B car if lowered.
There's a shyness found in reason
Apprehensive influence swallow away
You seem to feel abysmal take it
Then you're careful grace for sure
Kinda like the way you're breathing
Kinda like the way you keep looking away

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8879
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4708
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: Atlas FMC 5077 in hand — a couple of quick pics
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2016, 09:15:19 PM »
0
I didn't check against an X58 but I will.  The ride height does appear to be spot on.  Body mounted Accumates in coupler boxes screwed to the floor, so easily replaceable with MTL 1015s.  The mounting point is outward to simulate the cushioned underframe.  If not, the MTL 1016 will do as a stand-in.  The end is notched to accommodate the coupler box, but not noticeable because the etched end platform is directly above it.

This is a plate B car, and superior to the MTL car in all aspects.  The MTL model most noteably suffers from compressed-height syndrome.
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net


ai5629

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 781
  • Respect: +213
Re: Atlas FMC 5077 in hand — a couple of quick pics
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2016, 09:42:44 PM »
0
I didn't check against an X58 but I will.  The ride height does appear to be spot on.  Body mounted Accumates in coupler boxes screwed to the floor, so easily replaceable with MTL 1015s.  The mounting point is outward to simulate the cushioned underframe.  If not, the MTL 1016 will do as a stand-in.  The end is notched to accommodate the coupler box, but not noticeable because the etched end platform is directly above it.

Thank you for checking and giving your expert analysis.  My order has been placed.

Jeff
Jeff Lopez

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 24682
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +9122
    • Conrail 1285
Re: Atlas FMC 5077 in hand — a couple of quick pics
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2016, 10:55:42 PM »
0
Oh *****. I forgot these weren't the Trainman cars. Now I'm gonna have to stock up.

bbussey

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8879
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +4708
    • www.bbussey.net
Re: Atlas FMC 5077 in hand — a couple of quick pics
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2016, 11:48:20 PM »
0
... How does it look next to an X58 (the N scale boxcar ride height gold standard)? ...

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
Bryan Busséy
NHRHTA #2246
NSE #1117
www.bbussey.net