Author Topic: So THIS IS a B-2-BT !  (Read 886 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9828
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2522
« Last Edit: April 30, 2012, 12:43:39 PM by up1950s »


Richie Dost

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6812
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1732
Re: So THIS IS a B-2-BT !
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2012, 12:43:12 PM »
0
EMD's first foray into Steam?
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 25205
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +10008
    • Conrail 1285
Re: So THIS IS a B-2-BT !
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2012, 05:11:19 PM »
0
It's always amused me that the company that makes those things rips off the Blomberg truck so blatantly.

Bremner

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 450
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: 0
Re: So THIS IS a B-2-BT !
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2012, 05:13:17 PM »
0
it's actually a model of the Southern Pacific #1, the C.P. Huntington, which lives in the California Railroad Museum

http://myweb.msoe.edu/~westr/Pictures/California%20Short%20Lines%20and%20Museums/CPRR%201.JPG

Bob Bufkin

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6397
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +44
Re: So THIS IS a B-2-BT !
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2012, 05:14:33 PM »
0
I wanna know what they are all looking at?

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11107
  • Respect: +2626
Re: So THIS IS a B-2-BT !
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2012, 07:04:17 PM »
0
It's always amused me that the company that makes those things rips off the Blomberg truck so blatantly.

No, it's supposed to be a model of a Blomberg. It's the only off-the-shelf truck available in 15" gauge with integrated drive. It was originally made for zoo/amusement park F-units. The company who makes that faux steamer uses them as a matter of convenience for the gasoline drivetrain, the big 2-wheel driver is a dummy. This is versus the cost of designing their own archbar truck, especially given all the modern grief coming from state regulators - and even the FRA - regarding "passenger conveyances".
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 25205
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +10008
    • Conrail 1285
Re: So THIS IS a B-2-BT !
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2012, 07:46:37 PM »
0
But I thought that recent incident at the park proved that there AREN't applicable regs. That definitely makes  sense from a reuse perspective. It's not like most kids would care.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 11107
  • Respect: +2626
Re: So THIS IS a B-2-BT !
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2012, 08:14:27 PM »
0
Huh. There's obviously some state-to-state variances. In Illinois, a regional favorite park line built in the '50s went through all sorts of... uh... "heck" after a new donor and operator started restoring the deteriorated assets. Possibly the difference here was that live steam was involved, and definitely in that case you get into the new boiler regs. But I do recall the state amusement park regulator had to approve the track and rolling stock work, too.
...mike

http://www.gibboncozadandwestern.com

Note: Images linked in my postings are on an HTTP server, not HTTPS. Enable "mixed content" in your browser to view.

There are over 1000 images on this server. Not changing anytime soon.

Ed Kapuscinski

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 25205
  • Head Kino
  • Respect: +10008
    • Conrail 1285
Re: So THIS IS a B-2-BT !
« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2012, 12:16:51 AM »
0
Interesting. I had read through this a while ago, and it seemed like it's a real mess.
http://www.rypn.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=32620