Author Topic: Old Layout Scenery - Need Feedback  (Read 2576 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chuck geiger

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 3568
  • Gender: Male
  • Train Talk Media
  • Respect: +3961
Re: Old Layout Scenery - Need Feedback
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2011, 04:24:28 PM »
0

MichaelWinicki

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2096
  • Respect: +335
Re: Old Layout Scenery - Need Feedback
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2011, 04:37:27 PM »
0
Foliage clusters are a good choice simply because they're more angular.  You don't get the "eggs in a carton" look.

Dave V

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12234
  • Gender: Male
  • Foothills Farm Studios -- Dave's Model Railroading
  • Respect: +11671
Re: Old Layout Scenery - Need Feedback
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2011, 05:01:32 PM »
0
A mix of foliage clusters in the back and Super Trees in the front with some smaller Super Trees in the middle seems to work and give a little bit of forced perspective.


Scottl

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 5306
  • Respect: +2619
Re: Old Layout Scenery - Need Feedback
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2011, 05:12:29 PM »
0
I think we often idealize forest trees with our notions of urban specimens.  While the latter might have nice, rounded crowns, most trees fight for space and compete to get to the top of the canopy.  Hence, they tend to be more vertically structured than rounded.  The puff ball approach is kind of like a forest of park trees.  Teasing them up into more irregular shapes would go a long way in removing the regularity of the technique.

Personally, I thought your scenery was very well executed.