Author Topic: CP DC-3  (Read 776 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

up1950s

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9828
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +2522


Richie Dost

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4420
  • Respect: +730
    • My train pics
Re: CP DC-3
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2011, 09:28:54 AM »
0
Neat. I love the script, and like I always say, it looks good on everything. Kind of an undignified retirement for the old bird, but still...

Ryan87

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 799
  • Gender: Male
  • Stay thirsty my friend...
  • Respect: 0
Re: CP DC-3
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2011, 11:10:41 AM »
0
Both Canadian railways were true integrated "transportation" companies, having Railways, Airlines, Trucking Companies, Ships (CP more then CN), Hotels. They were the largest companies in Canada and among the worlds first true conglomerates

What prevented American railways from expanding into other markets? was there regulation issues, or more of a management philosophy? I know Penn Central tried but failed, mind you they might not be the best example of the industry...
Swimming in a sea of Action Red...

cv_acr

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2676
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +131
    • Canadian Freight Railcar Gallery
Re: CP DC-3
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2011, 10:18:06 AM »
0
SPRINT started out as a subsidiary of Southern Pacific:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprint_Nextel

Quote
Southern Pacific Communications Company (SPC), a unit of the Southern Pacific Railroad, began providing long-distance telephone service after the Execunet II decision late in 1978. SPC was headquartered in Burlingame, California (where Sprint still maintains a technology lab, on Adrian Ct.)

The Railroad had an extensive microwave communications system along its rights of way used for internal communications; later (after the Execunet II decision) they expanded by laying fiber optic cables along the same rights of way. In 1972, they began selling surplus capacity on that system to corporations for use as Private Lines, thereby circumventing AT&T's then-monopoly on public telephony. Prior attempts at offering long distance voice services had not been approved by the Federal Communications Commission, although a fax service (called SpeedFAX) was permitted.

As mentioned, SPC was only permitted to provide Private Lines, not switched services. When MCI Communications released Execunet, SPC took the FCC to court to get the right to offer switched services, and succeeded (the "Execunet II" decision). They decided they needed a new name to differentiate the switched voice service from SpeedFAX, and ran an internal contest to select one. The winning entry was "Sprint"; an acronym for Southern Pacific Railroad Intelligent Network of Telecommunications.

The Sprint service was first marketed to six metropolitan areas: New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Diego and Anaheim. The switches were located in Los Angeles and New York. A customer was required to have a Private Line connection to one of these switches in order to use the service, and paid an access fee per Private Line. The customer was then billed at 2.6 cents per tenth of a minute increment.

In 1982 SPC became part of GTE under the name GTE Sprint. GTE had previously acquired a national X.25 provider, Telenet, in 1979. Wilson Park 2-5 Meer

[edit] Consolidation and re-branding to SprintIn 1986, GTE Sprint and Telenet were merged with the United Telecom properties US Telecom, Uninet and ISACOMM, to form US Sprint. Initially this was a joint venture co-owned by GTE and United. Then in 1988 United sold Telespectrum to Centel to fund the purchase of an additional 30% of US Sprint. This purchase gave United operational control of US Sprint.

In 1989 United Telecom purchased a controlling interest, and in 1991 completed its acquisition of US Sprint. The same year United Telecom changed its name to Sprint, due in large part to the increased brand recognition as a result of the successful Candice Bergen "Dime Lady" advertisement campaign.