0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Another good SD40-2 is always a good thing. Like GP9 and F7s, these can be turned out monthly for years by multiple manufacturers.
I'm with Peteski; we could use a new state of the art GP 7/9. The Atlas ones are good, but they're falling behind a bit in terms of proto details and such. I say this because I'm moving from DC to DCC and looking to replace some of my older models and not seeing replacements that measure up to today's standards. How about some freestanding grabs... Geoff
With regard the F's, not only are the grabs too thick, but they stand about 2' tall. The grill on the ATSF units looks a little weird, as do the class lights (although the Pennsylvania model looks better). There is also something off with the nose contours, and it looks to me that the windshield lays back too much; it should be more vertical. And the window glass has that 'big fat plastic insert' look to it. Kato and IM are better.Geoff
As long as we're lobbing grenades: the cryo tanks are interesting to me, but couldn't they at least pick a contrasting background colour for their model photos?
I was just reading the April 2017 issue of Model Railroad News and they had a feature on all the awful SD40-2s made in N scale before the IM version.
Funny that you mentioned GP9s. Wit the proliferation of the F-units out there, from multiple manufacturers, the only viable GP9 (and GP7) are pretty much only made by Atlas. Yes, there was early Arnold/rapido Geep, but it is not really a contender in the current market. Ok, Bachmann recently came out with a Geep but I still prefer Atlas. I wonder why not more manufacturers have jumped on the Geep bandwagon?
This from another forum. Good to know N scale steam is doing well!Otto K. (Attachment Link)