Author Topic: Crude oil derailment, fire  (Read 9260 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ian MacMillan

  • Global Moderator
  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 12024
  • Gender: Male
  • Learn to use the god damn search feature!
  • Respect: +157
    • Conrail's Amoskeag Northern Division
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #60 on: July 19, 2013, 09:55:36 PM »
0
 He'll we skate any string of cars on both ends and handbrake ends at min. If it was loaded Cement Quebec when they were our customer cars we would also handbrake every 4th car.
I WANNA SEE THE BOAT MOVIE!

Yes... I'm in N... Also HO and 1:1

peteski

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 31792
  • Gender: Male
  • Honorary Resident Curmudgeon
  • Respect: +4593
    • Coming (not so) soon...
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #61 on: July 20, 2013, 03:37:47 AM »
0
Earlier tonight, the talking heads on the news said that information was released stating that the derailment was caused by a brake failure. Still unknown was whether it was a human error or a mechanical failure.   :|
. . . 42 . . .

nkalanaga

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 9647
  • Respect: +1325
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #62 on: July 21, 2013, 01:04:22 AM »
0
The quote I saw on CBC was "insufficient braking force applied", which sounds like they're blaming the way the brakes were used, rather than the brakes themselves.

If that's the case, it will be interesting to see if the engineer was following company/government standards.  If not, he would seem to be responsible.  If he was, then obviously the standards are faulty.  If there are no standards, and it's strictly a judgement call by the crew, it's likely to happen again.
N Kalanaga
Be well

Specter3

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 856
  • Respect: +149
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #63 on: July 23, 2013, 08:50:05 PM »
0
I still want to know who the railroad officials the firemen turned the locomotive over to.

Smike

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 819
  • Respect: +196
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #64 on: July 23, 2013, 09:33:55 PM »
0
The officals if they put blame on any one person in this type of event it will be pointless and will do nothing to prevent any future accident of the same.

Bottom line for me is that no one single person should have had the ability to make any mistake which would lead to this. Redundancy is needed if the person is the single point of failure.

C855B

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 10669
  • Respect: +2285
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #65 on: July 23, 2013, 11:11:24 PM »
0

wazzou

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 6635
  • #GoCougs
  • Respect: +1569
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #66 on: July 30, 2013, 12:29:31 PM »
0
Excellent video from better times...


Not a valid youtube URL
Bryan

Member of NPRHA, Modeling Committee Member
http://www.nprha.org/
Member of MRHA


Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8803
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1527
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #67 on: July 30, 2013, 12:54:32 PM »
0
I love all the Alco's running with their doors open.  One presumes they did so for cooling purposes.

The track arrangements shown in the video certainly make it clear how that train got to the center of town and derailed at enough speed to cause the explosion.
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.

"Yes there are somethings that are "off;" but hey, so what." ~ Wyatt

"I'm trying to have less cranial rectal inversion with this." - Ed K.

"There's more to MRR life than the Wheezy & Nowheresville." C855B

sharriso

  • Posts: 12
  • Respect: 0
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #68 on: July 30, 2013, 04:59:49 PM »
0
Like the video.  Half an hour well spent.

Found this today.

/>


    Shawn and Sally Harrison
    - Modeling 1850s B&O

Smike

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 819
  • Respect: +196
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #69 on: August 08, 2013, 08:08:39 AM »
0

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4208
  • Respect: +583
    • My train pics
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #70 on: August 08, 2013, 09:20:50 AM »
0
Not a surprise at all. Even if the costs associated with the derailment didn't kill them first, the loss of their mainline and resulting steep drop in traffic would have. I think that the MMA was somewhat of a paycheque to paycheque operation, and the money was bound to run out quickly.

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4208
  • Respect: +583
    • My train pics

Philip H

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 8803
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +1527
    • Layout Progress Blog
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #72 on: August 13, 2013, 11:55:22 AM »
0
wonder why it took so long?
Philip H.
Chief Everything Officer
Baton Rouge Southern RR - Mount Rainier Division.

"Yes there are somethings that are "off;" but hey, so what." ~ Wyatt

"I'm trying to have less cranial rectal inversion with this." - Ed K.

"There's more to MRR life than the Wheezy & Nowheresville." C855B

lock4244

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 4208
  • Respect: +583
    • My train pics
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #73 on: August 13, 2013, 12:13:25 PM »
0
Probably giving them adequate time to find someone will to provide coverage. Failing that, time required to wind down operations (pulling remaining cars of the line).

cv_acr

  • Crew
  • *
  • Posts: 2669
  • Gender: Male
  • Respect: +127
    • Canadian Freight Railcar Gallery
Re: Crude oil derailment, fire
« Reply #74 on: August 13, 2013, 02:43:36 PM »
0
So who's running the betting pool on which railroad takes over the former MMA trackage when the dust settles?